Welcome to Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology
Volume 21Issue 4
.
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Xin, DUAN Feng, ZHANG Ying-chao. Description method of conceptual model based on the ontology[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 21(4): 510-517.
Citation: CHEN Xin, DUAN Feng, ZHANG Ying-chao. Description method of conceptual model based on the ontology[J].JOURNAL OF BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 21(4): 510-517.

Description method of conceptual model based on the ontology

  • Received Date:2011-05-22
  • The conceptual model is the first time abstraction of the real world. The traditional conceptual model description method based on the UML and the text usually has the semantic ambiguity problem. The formal description method lacks the mechanism of integrity and consistency check. Therefore both of them cannot support the simulation scenario description and the model composability. A simulation conceptual description method based on ontology is put forward. According to the OWL language which was put forward by the W3C organization, a conceptual model description language is established. The OWL language semantic element in the description function in the military conceptual model is introduced. Then two layers of the military conceptual model framework are built up based on the general ontology and the domain ontology. In the general ontology, the class and property definition are given. While in the domain ontology, they are extended and a related example is given. The technique advantages of our method include the mechanism of conceptual model consistency and integrity check, the support of composable simulation models, and automatic creation of simulation scenario.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Lee W Lacy. Developing aconsensus perspective on conceptual models for simulation systems //Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability Workshop. : SISO, 2001.
    [2]
    Gustavson P, Zimmerman P, Turrell C. Capturing intent-of-use meta-data for the conceptual model—a key to component reuse . 1-05-10]. Proceedings of Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop. http://www.simventions.com/whitepapers/03F-SIW-080.pdf.
    [3]
    Wang Xinglin, Guo Qisheng, Ding Shiyong. Discussion and formal abstract description of conceptual model of mission space [J]. Journal of System Simulation,2003,15(10):1408-1409.
    [4]
    Wu Yongbo,Sha Jichang,Tan Dongfeng. The development methodology of the conceptual model of two phases mission space based on ontology[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology,2005,27(6):120-125.
    [5]
    Liu Jing, Yuan Weiwei, Luo Xueshan. Research of the ontology used in the C4ISR system[J]. Information Command Control System & Simulation Technolog,2004,26(1):16-21.
    [6]
    Karagöz N A. A framework for developing conceptual models of the mission space for simulation systems . : Department of Information System, Middle East Technical University, 2008.
    [7]
    Studer R, Benjamins V R, Fensel D. Knowledge engineering: principles and method[J]. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 1998, 25(1-2): 161-197.
    [8]
    Genesereth M R, Fikes R E. Knowledge interchange format, Version 0.3, reference manual[M]. Stanford: Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, 1992.
    [9]
    Farquhar A, Fikes R, Rice J. The ontolingua server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1997,46(6):707-728.
    [10]
    The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL web ontology language overview: W3C recommendation .(2004-02-10). http://www.w3. org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/.
    [11]
    The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL web ontology language reference: W3C recommendation (200 4-0 2-10). http://www.w3. org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/.
    [12]
    The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL web ontology language guide: W3C recommendation .(2004-02-10). http://www.w3. org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/.
    [13]
    The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax: W3C recommendation .(2004-02-10). http:// www.w3.org/TR/2004/ REC-owl-semantics-20040210/.
    [14]
    The World Wide Web Consortium. OWL web ontology language use cases and requirements: W3C recommendation .(200 4-02-10). http:// www. w3.Org/TR/2004/REC-webont-req-20040210/.
    [15]
    Jack Hale Sheehan. Conceptualmodels of the mission space (CMMS): basic concepts, advanced techniques, and pragmatic examples //98 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop Papers. : SISO, 1998, 2: 893-900.
    [16]
    Wu Yongbo, Sha J -chaf, Tan Dongfeog. An analysis of military organization ontology [J]. Computer Engineering & Science, 2007,29(2):132-134.
    [17]
    Zhou Dongxiang, Zhong Hui, Deng Rui, et al. Survey of simulation composability of complex systems[J]. Journal of System Simulation,2007,19(8):1819-1823.
    [18]
    Fan Xihui, Liu Ping, Jin Bo. A method of scenario generation based on military conceptual models[J]. Journal of System Simulation,2007,19(9):18902-1904.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1937) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

      Return
      Return
        Baidu
        map