高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验

杨贤传,张磊

downloadPDF
文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2020> 22(3): 14-25
杨贤传, 张磊. 媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
引用本文: 杨贤传, 张磊. 媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
shu
YANG Xianchuan, ZHANG Lei. Media Persuasion Shaping and Urban Residents’ Green Purchasing Behavior—Testing Moderated Mediation Effects[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(3): 14-25. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
Citation: YANG Xianchuan, ZHANG Lei. Media Persuasion Shaping and Urban Residents’ Green Purchasing Behavior—Testing Moderated Mediation Effects[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
shu

媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847

  • 中国矿业大学 管理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“市场化下的电力来源结构与输配方案优化研究：基于省际层面的视角”（71874187）；国家自然科学基金项目“市场化情境下的动力煤贸易空间均衡模型及仿真研究”（71373261）；安徽省高校人文社科重点项目“利益关注和责任意识对城市居民低碳消费的驱动机制：理论与实证研究”（SK2017A0694）；安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划项目（gxyq2018207，gxyq2017248）

详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨贤传(1982-),男,博士研究生,铜陵职业技术学院教授,E-mail:yangxianchuan@126.com;张磊(1975-),男,管理学博士,教授,博士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:mailing126@126.com

  • 中图分类号:F272.3

Media Persuasion Shaping and Urban Residents’ Green Purchasing Behavior—Testing Moderated Mediation Effects

  • School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China

  • 摘要:利他诉求和利己诉求割裂导致的态度—行为偏差一直是绿色消费面临的主要障碍。为此，从有限道德假设和有限自利假设出发，基于改进后的目标框架理论构建一个媒体说服与绿色购买行为关系的理论模型，期望破解绿色消费“知行不合一”的困境。研究结果显示：媒体说服通过激活环境责任感知（规范目标框架）和绿色感知价值（消费价值目标框架），进而共同影响居民绿色购买行为；媒体说服对不同目标框架的形塑能力不同，导致各自发挥中介作用的差异；环境问题严重性感知负向调节了中介模型，从而发现绿色购买“脱敏”现象的发生机制。认为，媒体通过激活规范目标框架和消费价值目标框架是扩大绿色购买的有效途径，但在采取“恐惧诉求”策略时需要预防触发“脱敏”现象的发生机制。
    Abstract:Attitude-behavior bias caused by the dissociation of altruistic and egoistic appeals has always been the main obstacle to green consumption. Therefore, based on the bounded rationality and bounded ethicality hypotheses, this paper constructed a theoretical model of the relationship between media persuasion and green purchasing behavior based on the improved goal-framing theory, expecting to solve the dilemma of “knowledge and action are not one”. The results show that media persuasion affects residents’ green purchasing behavior by activating perceived environmental responsibility（normative goal frames） and green perceived value（consumption value goal frames）; different shaping powers of media persuasion for different goal frames lead to different mediating effects; perceived seriousness of environmental problems negatively moderates the mediation model, thus discovering the mechanism of green consumption “desensitization”. This study reveals that media through activating normative goal frames and consumption value goal frames is an effective way to expand green purchase, but the “reversion effect” should be avoided when fear appeals tactic is adopted.
  • [1] SCHLAILE M P,KLEIN K,BÖCK W. From bounded morality to consumer social responsibility:a transdisciplinary approach to socially responsible consumption and its obstacles[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018,149(3):561-588.
    [2] HAN H,HSU L T,SHEU C. Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice:testing the effect of environmental friendly activities[J]. Tourism Management,2010,31(3):325-334.
    [3] ZHANG Y,WANG Z,ZHOU G. Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations:an empirical study based on norm activation model[J]. Energy Policy,2013,62:1120-1127.
    [4] CIALDINI R B,RENO R R,KALLGREN C A. A focus theory of normative conduct:recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,58(6):1015-1026.
    [5] STERN P C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior[J]. Journal of Social Issues,2000,56(3):407-424.
    [6] LIANG D,HOU C,JO M S,et al. Pollution avoidance and green purchase:the role of moral emotions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,210:1301-1310.
    [7] SHAW D,MCMASTER R,NEWHOLM T. Care and commitment in ethical consumption:an exploration of the"attitude-behaviour gap"[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2016,136(2):251-265.
    [8] ZHANG L,LI D,CAO C,et al. The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions:the mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,187:740-750.
    [9] 王汉瑛,邢红卫,田虹.定位绿色消费的"黄金象限":基于刻板印象内容模型的响应面分析[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(3):203-214.
    [10] LINDENBERG S,STEG L. Normative,gain and hedonic goal-frames guiding environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Social Issues,2007,63(1):117-137.
    [11] DAGHER G K,ITANI O. Factors influencing green purchasing behaviour:empirical evidence from the lebanese consumers[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,2014,13(3):188-195.
    [12] LEE K. Opportunities for green marketing:young consumers,marketing intelligence&planning[J]. 2008,26(6):573-586.
    [13] PERSAUD A,SCHILLO S R. Purchasing organic products:role of social context and consumer innovativeness[J]. Marketing Intelligence&Planning,2017,35(1):130-146.
    [14] STEG L,BOLDERDIJK J W,KEIZER K,et al. An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour:the role of values,situational factors and goals[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2014,38:104-115.
    [15] HOVLAND C I,JANIS I L,KELLEY H H. Communication and persuasion[M]. New Heaven,CT:Yale University Press,1953.
    [16] JANIS I L,FESHBACH S. Effects of fear-arousing communications[J]. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,1953,48(1):78-92.
    [17] ROGERS R W,MEWBORN C R. Fear appeals and attitude change:effects of a threat's noxiousness,probability of occurrence,and the efficacy of coping responses[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1976,34(1):54-61.
    [18] DABBS J M,LEVENTHAL H. Effects of varying the recommendations in a fear-arousing communication[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1966,4(5):525-531.
    [19] FREDERICK S,LOEWENSTEIN G,O'DONOGHUE T. Time discounting and time preference:a critical review[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2002,40(2):351-401.
    [20] MORAES C,CARRIGAN M,SZMIGIN I. The coherence of inconsistencies:attitude-behaviour gaps and new consumption communities[J]. Journal of Marketing Management,2012,28(1-2):103-128.
    [21] LEE K. The green purchase behavior of Hongkong young consumers:the role of peer influence,local environmental involvement,and concrete environmental knowledge[J]. Journal of International Consumer Marketing,2010,23(1):21-44.
    [22] HARRIS P G. Green or brown? environmental attitudes and governance in greater china[J]. Nature&Culture,2008,3(2):151-182.
    [23] TRIVEDI R H,PATEL J D,ACHARYA N. Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude,intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,196:11-22.
    [24] YANG D F,LU Y,ZHU W T,et al. Going green:how different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior[J]. Journal of Business Research,2015,68(12):2663-2675.
    [25] MOSTAFA M. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers'green purchase behaviour:the effects of environmental knowledge,concern and attitude[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies,2007,31(3):220-229.
    [26] CHENG T M,WU H C. How do environmental knowledge,environmental sensitivity,and place attachment affect environmentally responsible behavior? an integrated approach for sustainable island tourism[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,2015,23(4):557-576.
    [27] CLAYTON S. Models of justice in the environmental debate[J]. Journal of Social Issues,2000,56(3):459-474.
    [28] SCHWARTZ S H. Normative influences on altruism. advances in experimental social psychology[M]. New York:Academic Press,1977:221-279.
    [29] WOODRUFF R B. Customer value:the next source for competitive advantage[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,1997,25(2):139-153.
    [30] ZEITHAML V,PARASURAMAN A,BERRY L. Delivering quality service,balancing customer perceptions and expectations[M]. New York:The Free Press,1990:30-32.
    [31] SHETH J N,NEWMAN B I,GROSS B L. Why we buy what we buy:a theory of consumption values[J]. Journal of Business Research,1991,22(2):159-170.
    [32] BISWAS A,ROY M. Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions:testing the structural model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,95:332-340.
    [33] HE B,ZHU J. Constructing community gardens? residents'attitude and behaviour towards edible landscapes in emerging urban communities of China[J]. Urban Forestry&Urban Greening,2018,34:154-165.
    [34] ZEITHAML V A. Consumer perceptions of price,quality and value:a means-end model and synthesis of evidence[J]. Journal of Marketing,1988,52(3):2-22.
    [35] DE MEDEIROS J F,RIBEIRO J L D,CORTIMIGLIA M N. Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in brazil[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,110:158-169.
    [36] LEE K. Gender differences in Hongkong adolescent consumers'green purchasing behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing,2009,26(2):87-96.
    [37] BORD R I,O'CONNOR R E. The gender gap in environmental attitudes:the case of perceived vulnerability to risk[J]. Social Science Quarterly,1997,78(4):830-840.
    [38] WANG J,BAO J,WANG C,et al. The impact of different emotional appeals on the purchase intention for green products:the moderating effects of green involvement and confucian cultures[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2017,34:32-42.
    [39] HUNGERFORD H R,VOLK T L. Changing learner behavior through environmental education[J]. Journal of Environmental Education,1990,21(3):8-21.
    [40] FELDMANN C,HAMM U. Consumers'perceptions and preferences for local food:a review[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2015,40:152-164.
    [41] CHAN R Y K. Determinants of Chinese consumers'green purchase behavior[J]. Psychology&Marketing,2001,18(4):389-413.
    [42] CURRAN P J,WEST S G,FINCH J F. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis[J]. Psychological Methods,1996,1(1):16-29.
    [43] TORKZADEH G,KOUFTEROS X,PFLUGHOEFT K. Confirmatory analysis of computer self efficacy[J]. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary,2003,10:263-275.
    [44] BARON R M,KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptua,strategic,and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
    [45] ZHAO X,LYNCH J G,CHEN Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny:myths and truths about mediationanalysis[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2010,37(2):197-206.
    [46] PREACHER K J,HAYES A F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models[J]. Behavior Research Methods,2008,40(3):879-891.
    [47]
    [48]
    [49] 洪大用,卢春天.公众环境关心的多层分析——基于中国CGSS2003的数据应用[J].社会学研究,2011,26(6):154-170

    +244-245.
    [50] EDWARDS J R,LAMBERT L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods,2007,12(1):1-22.
    [51] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation,moderation,and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach[M]. New York:Routledge,2013.
    [52] PREACHER K J,RUCKER D,HAYES A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses:theory,methods,and prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research,2007,42(1):185-227.
    [53] 冉华,耿书培.健康信息的特质与组织方式对受众接受效果的影响研究——以女性宫颈癌预防传播为例[J].新闻与传播评论,2018,71(5):79-91.
  • [1] 孙凤芝, 贾衍菊.旅游社区居民感知视角下政府信任影响因素——社会交换理论的解释. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 90-99.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.6643
    [2] 王晓楠, 周林意.新媒体影响力对雾霾风险感知的作用机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 41-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.3290
    [3] 严玲, 刘柳, 曾诚.合同风险分担条款对承包人公平感知的影响——基于多元参照点的实验研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 67-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1319
    [4] 贺明华, 梁晓蓓, 肖琳.共享经济监管机制对感知隐私风险、消费者信任及持续共享意愿的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (6): 55-64.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3713
    [5] 吴双, 闫强, 周依群.电子口碑平台对感知可信度及购买意愿的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 72-81.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2037
    [6] 林民望.政府购买公共服务：一个整合性分析框架. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (1): 91-98.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0112
    [7] 马宝龙, 权级慧, 王逸仁, 李晓飞.忠诚计划服务质量对顾客忠诚的影响机制——基于零售业的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (3): 67-74,107.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.1408
    [8] 贾哲敏.网络媒体从业者的价值观、满意度与自我表达析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (3): 152-157.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0320
    [9] 王丽丽.信息一致性视角下媒体报道对风险感知的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (6): 153-158.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0621
    [10] 王秀村, 饶晨.虚拟品牌社区中顾客感知支持构成与作用机制. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 99-105.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0613
    [11] 李冬伟, 俞钰凡.中国大型企业社会责任战略选择动因研究——一个新制度理论解释框架. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (3): 60-69.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0309
    [12] 王仙雅, 毛文娟.消费者对企业社会责任缺失行为的感知——消费者归因和期望的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 74-80,112.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0610
    [13] 薛永基, 杨志坚, 李健.慈善捐赠行为对企业品牌资产的影响——企业声誉与风险感知的中介效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (4): 58-66.
    [14] 王崇, 刘健.消费者网络购物渠道决策——基于感知价值. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (3): 62-68.
    [15] 张圣亮, 王爱霞.网上银行顾客感知服务质量影响因素研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (1): 59-63,72.
    [16] 张圣亮, 赵芳芳.顾客关系对感知损失、情绪和补救期望的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (3): 54-60.
    [17] 翟杰全.科技传播政策：框架与目标. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (2): 10-12.
    [18] 孙曙迎.消费者网络信息可信度感知影响因素的实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 50-54.
    [19] 张月莉, 王方华, 过聚荣.复杂购买行为模式下的品牌忠诚研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (6): 34-38.
    [20] 李宗录.以价值论构建环境法学基本框架. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (3): 45-47.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:1707
  • HTML全文浏览量:0
  • PDF下载量:2235
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-03
  • 刊出日期:2020-07-09

媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
  • 中国矿业大学 管理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116
    • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目“市场化下的电力来源结构与输配方案优化研究：基于省际层面的视角”（71874187）；国家自然科学基金项目“市场化情境下的动力煤贸易空间均衡模型及仿真研究”（71373261）；安徽省高校人文社科重点项目“利益关注和责任意识对城市居民低碳消费的驱动机制：理论与实证研究”（SK2017A0694）；安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划项目（gxyq2018207，gxyq2017248）

    作者简介:

    杨贤传(1982-),男,博士研究生,铜陵职业技术学院教授,E-mail:yangxianchuan@126.com;张磊(1975-),男,管理学博士,教授,博士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:mailing126@126.com

  • 收稿日期:2019-06-03
  • 刊出日期:2020-07-09

  • 中图分类号:F272.3

摘要:利他诉求和利己诉求割裂导致的态度—行为偏差一直是绿色消费面临的主要障碍。为此，从有限道德假设和有限自利假设出发，基于改进后的目标框架理论构建一个媒体说服与绿色购买行为关系的理论模型，期望破解绿色消费“知行不合一”的困境。研究结果显示：媒体说服通过激活环境责任感知（规范目标框架）和绿色感知价值（消费价值目标框架），进而共同影响居民绿色购买行为；媒体说服对不同目标框架的形塑能力不同，导致各自发挥中介作用的差异；环境问题严重性感知负向调节了中介模型，从而发现绿色购买“脱敏”现象的发生机制。认为，媒体通过激活规范目标框架和消费价值目标框架是扩大绿色购买的有效途径，但在采取“恐惧诉求”策略时需要预防触发“脱敏”现象的发生机制。

English Abstract

杨贤传, 张磊. 媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
引用本文: 杨贤传, 张磊. 媒体说服形塑与城市居民绿色购买行为——调节中介效应检验[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
shu
YANG Xianchuan, ZHANG Lei. Media Persuasion Shaping and Urban Residents’ Green Purchasing Behavior—Testing Moderated Mediation Effects[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(3): 14-25. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
Citation: YANG Xianchuan, ZHANG Lei. Media Persuasion Shaping and Urban Residents’ Green Purchasing Behavior—Testing Moderated Mediation Effects[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(3): 14-25.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1847
shu
参考文献 (53)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回

        作者相关

        写作规范

        友情链接

        总访问量: 今日访问量:

        版权所有：bob手机在线登陆学术期刊中心

        主管单位: 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位: bob手机在线登陆 地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街5号

        本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发  百度统计

        Baidu
        map