高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力

吴伟

downloadPDF
文章导航> bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）> 2016> (1): 103-114
吴伟. 组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 103-114. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
引用本文: 吴伟. 组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 103-114.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
shu
WU Wei. Organizational Feature, External Constraints and Capability of Business Association[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, (1): 103-114. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
Citation: WU Wei. Organizational Feature, External Constraints and Capability of Business Association[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, (1): 103-114.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
shu

组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
  • 1.

    对外经济贸易大学 公共管理学院, 北京 100029

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金一般项目资助(10BGL103);国家留学基金资助。

Organizational Feature, External Constraints and Capability of Business Association

  • 1.

    School of Public Administration, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

  • 摘要:构建行业协会制度能力和服务能力测度指标,实证研究表明:协会组织特点、外部约束对于制度能力以及制度能力对于服务能力具有影响。组织特点中,协会兼职或离退休官员的存在不利于协会制度能力提高,尤其是离退休官员。收入虽然对制度能力没影响,但显著影响了服务能力。外部约束中,行业竞争不利于协会制度能力,也没有影响服务能力,反而容易诱发协会寻租活动。协会间竞争对于制度能力、服务能力都没有影响,但对寻租活动抑制效果显著。政策只对协会促进会员遵守规则的制度能力具有正向作用,对协会服务能力提升没有产生效果,仅减少了协会寻租可能。制度能力对于协会总体服务能力和正向服务能力都具有积极作用,而对于负向能力没有影响。
    Abstract:Constructing assessment indicators of institutional capacity and service ability of business association, this paper's positive analysis shows that organizational feature and external constraints impact institutional capacity which further affects service ability. For organizational factors, concurrent posts of officials or retired ones don't benefit improvement of institutional capacity, especially the negative influence of retired officials. Income has significant positive impact on service ability of business association, but no impact on institutional capacity. For external constraints, industrial competition do harm to institutional capacity as well as service ability, which may induce rent-seeking activities. The rivalry of business associations doesn't exert any influence on both institutional capacity and service ability. However, this competition significantly restrains rent-seeking activity. Public policy helps advance institutional capacity of “membership compliance with rule” which has no effect on the elevation of service ability, but could nevertheless reduce the possibility of rent-seeking. Institutional capacity has positive effect on both general service ability and positive service ability. However, it exerts no effect on negative ability.
  • [1] Ben Ross Schneider,Richard F Doner. The new institutional economics,business associations,and development[J]. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy,2000a(2０):261-288.
    [2] Kuo,Cheng Tian. Global competitiveness and industrial growth in taiwan and the philippines[M]. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press,1995.
    [3] Evans Peter. Embedded autonomy[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1995.
    [4] Doner,Richard F,Gary Hawes. The political economy of growth in southeast and northeast asia[M]//The Changing Political Economy of the Third World.Boulder:Lynne Rienner,1995.
    [5] Fletcher W Miles. The japan spinners association[J]. Journal of Japanese Studies,1996,22(1):49-75.
    [6] Campos Jose',Hilton Root. The Key to the Asian Miracle[M]. Washington,DC:Brookings Institution,1996.
    [7] Sylvia Maxfield,Ben Ross Schneider. Business and the state in developing countries[M]. Cornell University Press,1997.
    [8] Clague Christopher. Institutions and economic development[M]. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1997.
    [9] Richard F Doner,Ben Ross Schneider. Business associations and economic development:why some associations contribute more than others[J]. Business and Politics,2000b(2):261-288.
    [10] Simon Ville. Rent seeking or market strengthening?industry associations in New Zealand wool broking[J]. Business History Review,2007(81):297-321.
    [11] Mancur Olson. The logic of collective action:public goods and the theory of groups[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1965.
    [12] Lane C,Bachmann R. Cooperation in inter-firm relations in Britain and Germany:the role of social institutions[J]. British Journal of Sociology,1997(42):226-254.
    [13] Moore Pete. Doing business with the state:explaining business lobbying in the arab world[D]. Montreal:McGill University,1998.
    [14] Nadvi Khalid. Collective efficiency and collective failure[J]. World Development. 1999a,27(9):1605-1626.
    [15] Rogowski Ronald. Structure,growth,and power[M]//Robert Bates. Toward a Political Economy of Development. Berkeley:University of California Press,1988.
    [16] Streeck Wolfgang,Philippe Schmitter. Community,market,state—and associations?the prospective contribution of interest governance to social order[M]//Streeck Schmitter.Private Interest Governance. London:Sage,1985.
    [17] Lamoreaux. The great merger movement in American business 1895-1904[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1988.
    [18] Crouch Traxler F. Organised industrial interest in Europe:what future?[M]. Avebury:Aldershot,1995.
    [19] Grahame Fallon,Reva Berman Brown. Does Britain need public law status chambers of commerce?[J]. European Business Review,2000(12):19-27.
    [20] Thorp Rosemary,Francisco Durand. A historical view of business-state relations:Colombia,Peru,and Venezuela compared[M]//Sylvia Maxfield,Ben Ross Schneider. Business and the State in Developing Countries. Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1997.
    [21] Mancur Olson. The rise and decline of nations:economic growth,stagflation,and social rigidities[M]. New Haven:Yale University Press,1982.
    [22] 郁建兴. 后双重管理体制时代的行业协会商会发展[J]. 浙江社会科学,2013(12):53-77.
    [23] 余晖. 行业协会及其在中国的发展:理论与案例[M]. 北京:经济管理出版社,2002.
    [24] 王名,刘培峰. 民间组织通论[M]. 北京:时事出版社,2004.
    [25] 赵永亮,张捷. 商会服务功能研究——公共品还是俱乐部品供给[J]. 管理世界,2009(12):48-56.
    [26] 冯巨章. 企业合作网络的边界——以商会为例[J]. 中国工业经济,2006(1):72-79.
    [27] 郁建兴. 商会组织治理的新分析框架及其应用[J]. 中国行政管理,2009(4):59-64.
    [28] 甫玉龙,史晓葳. 完善行业协会内部治理结构的探讨[J]. 中国行政管理,2009(7):70-72.
    [29] 徐家良. 双重赋权:中国行业协会的基本特征[J]. 天津行政学院学报,2003(1):34-38.
    [30] 陈剩勇等. 温州民间商会:自主治理的制度分析[J]. 管理世界,2004(12):31-49.
    [31] 李文增. 加快改革我国行业协会的组织管理体制[J]. 宏观经济研究,2005(8):56-58.
    [32] 江华. 民间商会的一业多会问题及其求解路径——基于温州市行业协会的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2008(5):25-35.
    [33] Laothamatas Anek. Business associations and the new political economy of Thailand[M]. Boulder:Westview Press,1992.
    [34] Nadvi Khalid,Hubert Schmitz. Industrial clusters in less developed countries[R]. Sussex:Institute of Development Studies Discussion Paper 339,1994.
    [35] Oliver P. Selective incentives[M]//The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. The Wiley-Blackwell,2013.
    [36] Olson Hans. No growth society[M]. Routledge Press,1975.
    [37] Paola Perez-Aleman. A learning-centered view of business associations:building business-government relations for development [J]. Business and Politics,2003,5(2):193-213.
    [38] Aaron Kingsbury,Roger Hayter. Business associations and local development:the Okanagan wine industry's response to NAFTA [J]. Geoforum,2006(37):596-609.
    [39] John D Sullivan, Kim Eric Bettcher,Aleksandr Shkolnikov. Business associations,business climate,and economic growth:evidence from transition economies[M]. The CIPE Publications,2007.
    [40] Melani Cammett. Business-government relations and industrial change:the politics of upgrading in Morocco and Tunisia[J]. World Development,2007(35):1889-1903.
    [41] Zhou P,Ang B W. Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the shannon-spearman measure[J]. Social Indicators Research,2009(９4):83-96.
    [42] Frederik Booysen. An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development[J]. Social Indicators Research,2002(5９):115-151.
    [43] Colin Cameron,Pravin K Trivedi. Microeconometrics:methods and applications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
    [44] Colin Cameron,Pravin K Trivedi. Microeconometrics using stata[M]. Stata Press,2009.
  • [1] 肖淑芳, 石琦, 张一鸣.上市公司创新能力指数的构建. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(1): 57-69.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1666
    [2] 曹萍, 张剑, 熊焰.IT外包中组织内外部控制机制对知识转移的影响效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 97-106.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1077
    [3] 张真源, 黄锡生.资源环境承载能力监测预警的制度功能与完善. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (1): 162-170.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2844
    [4] 陈江华.国有企业学习型组织构建的外部市场行为分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (4): 71-77.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0410
    [5] 赵玮萍, 吕广玉.政府利益约束下制度变迁机制分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (1): 76-81,86.
    [6] 原小能.中国地区服务业创新能力评价. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (3): 44-50.
    [7] 洪瑾, 舒晓.我国行业协会自我运行能力研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (6): 50-54.
    [8] 宋利辉.跨文化交际现象分析及其能力培养探讨. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (4): 153-156.
    [9] 方德斌, 黄本笑, 殷永飞.工程管理专业学生创新能力培养教学评价研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (3): 135-140.
    [10] 庞文, 丁云龙.论城市贫困群体的自生能力与政策创新. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (3): 44-48.
    [11] 翟杰全.国家科技传播能力:影响因素与评价指标. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (4): 3-6.
    [12] 刘年辉.利益博弈与身份呈现——媒介组织作为经济组织的可能性与约束条件. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (6): 10-13.
    [13] 韩君玲.论日本审判制度的特点及其改革. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (1): 65-68.
    [14] 翟杰全.宏观科技传播研究:体制、政策与能力建设. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2004, (3): 22-25.
    [15] 张艳丽.破产能力探究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2004, (1): 57-60.
    [16] 魏强, 魏星, 李全兴.北京制造业科技综合能力评价研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (5): 55-58.
    [17] 严宇翔, 刘瑜.E-mail证据能力及其证明力探析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2003, (2): 32-33.
    [18] 邹澍, 韩伯棠.MRPII中能力需求计划的分析与实现. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (4): 38-41.
    [19] 朱安达.对工业设计的创造能力的探讨. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2001, (1): 87-89.
    [20] 虞庞勇, 罗剑波.伙伴关系、知识管理与企业核心能力. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 1999, (1): 49-51.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:550
  • HTML全文浏览量:0
  • PDF下载量:906
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-06
  • 刊出日期:2016-01-21

组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
  • 1. 对外经济贸易大学 公共管理学院, 北京 100029
    • 基金项目:

    国家社会科学基金一般项目资助(10BGL103);国家留学基金资助。

  • 收稿日期:2015-07-06
  • 刊出日期:2016-01-21

摘要:构建行业协会制度能力和服务能力测度指标,实证研究表明:协会组织特点、外部约束对于制度能力以及制度能力对于服务能力具有影响。组织特点中,协会兼职或离退休官员的存在不利于协会制度能力提高,尤其是离退休官员。收入虽然对制度能力没影响,但显著影响了服务能力。外部约束中,行业竞争不利于协会制度能力,也没有影响服务能力,反而容易诱发协会寻租活动。协会间竞争对于制度能力、服务能力都没有影响,但对寻租活动抑制效果显著。政策只对协会促进会员遵守规则的制度能力具有正向作用,对协会服务能力提升没有产生效果,仅减少了协会寻租可能。制度能力对于协会总体服务能力和正向服务能力都具有积极作用,而对于负向能力没有影响。

English Abstract

吴伟. 组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 103-114. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
引用本文: 吴伟. 组织特点、外部约束与行业协会能力[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (1): 103-114.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
shu
WU Wei. Organizational Feature, External Constraints and Capability of Business Association[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, (1): 103-114. doi: 10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
Citation: WU Wei. Organizational Feature, External Constraints and Capability of Business Association[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2016, (1): 103-114.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0114
shu
参考文献 (44)

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回

        作者相关

        写作规范

        友情链接

        总访问量: 今日访问量:

        版权所有：bob手机在线登陆学术期刊中心

        主管单位: 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部 主办单位: bob手机在线登陆 地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街5号

        本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发  百度统计

        Baidu
        map