考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0310

1.
安徽大学社会与政治学院, 合肥 230601
2.
中国科学技术大学公共事务学院, 合肥 230026
3.
中国科学技术大学管理学院, 合肥 230026

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（71571171）;中国博士后科学基金第58批面上资助项目（2015M582017）

The Comparative Analysis between Two Emission Abatements Considering Green Premium

1.
School of Sociology and Political Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2.
School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
3.
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

摘要:在限额与交易机制背景下，考虑排放依赖型生产商实施2种减排方式："末端减排方式"和"过程减排方式"。通过构建参数模型展示2种减排方式下，排放依赖型生产商进行运作优化的思路以及决策结果的异同。此外，市场中绿色消费者绿色偏好的涌现，虽然对排放依赖型生产商来说，相当于间接降低了减排成本，能够促进排放依赖型生产商在市场交易和减排处理之间优先选择自身减排处理，但是，如果排放依赖型生产商选择的是"过程减排方式"，那么他的运作决策就需要慎重执行，因为，只有有远见的排放依赖型生产商才能抓住绿色市场的机遇并做出最优决策以获取最大的利益。对于政府来说，一方面，可以通过宏观调控排放权的交易价格来引导排放依赖型生产商去探索最佳的净化减排方案；另一方面，还可以通过低碳宣传培养消费者的低碳意识以增强排放依赖型生产商进行自身减排的主动性。
- 末端减排/
- 过程减排/
- 绿色消费者/
- 绿色溢价/
- 运作优化
Abstract:An emission-dependent manufacturer considers two types of carbon emission abatement under the cap-and-trade mechanism. They are the "end-of-pipe technology" and the "clean technology". By constructing a parametric model,this paper shows the difference between those two emission abatements about the analysis approach and decision-making results. In addition,though the emergence of green premium from green consumers in the market can decrease the cost of emission reduction in some way,if the emission-dependent manufacturer choose the "clean technology",he need to be cautious when make decision. Only a far-sighted mission-dependent manufacturer can grasp the opportunity from green market to make the optimal decision and to get maximum benefit. Finally,for the government,on the one hand,it can guide the emission-dependent manufacturer to explore its own optimal emission abatement through regulate the carbon price,on the other hand,it can enhance the mission reduction enthusiasm of the emission-dependent manufacturer by increasing consumers' low-carbon awareness.
- end-of-pipe technology/
- clean technology/
- green consumer/
- green premium/
- operational optimization

[1]	苏京志,温敏,丁一汇,等. 全球变暖趋缓研究进展[J]. 大气科学,2016,40(6):1143-1153.
[2]	CHANG X,XIA H,ZHU H,et al. Production decisions in a hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing system with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2015,162:160-173.
[3]	JOHANSSON B. Climate policy instruments and industry-effects and potential responses in the Swedish context[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(15):2344-2360.
[4]	COOPER R N. Alternatives to Kyoto:the case for a carbon tax[J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology,2010,22(3):737-749.
[5]	ZHANG B,XU L. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2013,144(1):118-127.
[6]	LIU Z,GUAN D,CRAWFORD-BROWN D,et al. Energy policy:a low-carbon road map for China[J]. Nature,2013,500(7461):143-145.
[7]	LIU Z,GUAN D,WEI W,et al. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China[J]. Nature,2015,524(7565):335-338.
[8]	苏亮瑜,谢晓闻. 碳市场发展路径与功能实现:基于碳排放权的特殊性[J]. 广东财经大学学报,2017(1):24-32.
[9]	BRAUN E,WIELD D. Regulation as a means for the social control of technology[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,1994,6(3):259-272.
[10]	CLEMENZ G. Eco-labeling and horizontal product differentiation[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2010,45(4):481-497.
[11]	HUA G,CHENG T C E,WANG S. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2011,132(2):178-185.
[12]	ZHANG J J,NIE T F,DU S F. Optimal emission-dependent production policy with stochastic demand[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Science,2011,3(1-2):21-39.
[13]	LIU Z L,ANDERSON T D,CRUZ J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2012,218(3):602-613.
[14]	WAHID N A,RAHBAR E,SHYAN T S. Factors influencing the green purchase behavior of penang environmental volunteers[J]. International Business Management,2011,5(1):38-49.
[15]	DU S,TANG W,SONG M. Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,134:652-662.
[16]	AGUILAR F X,VLOSKY R P. Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the US[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2007,9(8):1100-1112.
[17]	ROHEIM C A,ASCHE F,SANTOS J I. The elusive price premium for ecolabelled products:evidence from seafood in the UK market[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2011,62(3):655-668.
[18]	孙欣,雷怀英. 中国全过程减排效应实证研究——以省域二氧化硫减排为例[J]. 华东经济管理,2012(7):58-61.
[19]	朱玉姣,高亮,杜少甫. 考虑政府补贴的排放依赖型生产优化[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版),2016(5):52-58.
[20]	DU S,HU L,SONG M. Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:1600-1607.
[21]	杜少甫,董骏峰,梁樑,等. 考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J]. 中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.

[1]	周鹏, 高朱红, 闻雯.政府补贴、碳减排目标约束与工业企业低碳策略选择. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(4): 118-128.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.1420
[2]	王兆华.《碳交易效率与企业减排决策研究》评介. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(1): 187-188.
[3]	王长波, 胡志伟, 周德群.中国居民消费间接CO₂排放核算及其关键减排路径. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(3): 15-27.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.1565
[4]	董梅.低碳城市试点政策的工业污染物净减排效应. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(5): 16-30.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.7255
[5]	桑圣举, 张强.考虑企业社会责任的绿色供应链优化决策. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 107-116.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.6877
[6]	骆海燕, 屈小娥, 胡琰欣.环保税制下政府规制对企业减排的影响——基于演化博弈的分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(1): 1-12.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.7593
[7]	杨博文.《巴黎协定》减排承诺下不遵约情事程序研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 134-141.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.3374
[8]	张文静, 马喜立.以环境税治理雾霾的减排效果及减排成本——基于动态多区域CGE模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 36-47.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2085
[9]	冯宗宪, 高赢.中国区域碳排放驱动因素、减排贡献及潜力探究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (4): 13-20.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2529
[10]	常香云, 李银萍, 王珊, 范体军.基准线法下企业最优碳减排和产品定价决策. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (6): 1-8.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2862
[11]	邓翔, 瞿小松.温室气体减排联盟及其稳定性分析——基于博弈论视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (3): 25-32.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2344
[12]	戴彦德, 吴凡.基于低碳转型的宏观经济情景模拟与减排策略. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 1-8.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0201
[13]	梁夏, 陈文颖.电动车参与调峰的碳减排潜力. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (4): 42-48.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0406
[14]	田家华, 田时中, 赵鹏大.减排约束下中国天然气供需安全评价:2006-2014年. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (2): 22-29.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0205
[15]	仲伟周, 张金灿.减排政策实施效果的非完全信息动态博弈. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (4): 28-33.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0404
[16]	焦建玲, 韩晓飞, 李兰兰, 朱俊红.减排约束下的中国石油需求预测. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (1): 48-52.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0107
[17]	邓晓兰, 陈宝东.碳减排约束下我国产业结构变迁的路径选择. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (6): 1-6.
[18]	赵慧卿, 郝枫.中国区域碳减排责任分摊研究——基于共同环境责任视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (6): 27-32,38.
[19]	范体军, 杨鉴, 骆瑞玲.碳排放交易机制下减排技术投资的生产库存. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (6): 14-21.
[20]	兰花.欧盟航空减排贸易指令的国际法分析——兼评中欧航空减排争议. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (3): 117-122.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:840
HTML全文浏览量:2
PDF下载量:547
被引次数:0

留言板

考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0310

The Comparative Analysis between Two Emission Abatements Considering Green Premium

计量

考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0310

1. 安徽大学社会与政治学院, 合肥 230601
2. 中国科学技术大学公共事务学院, 合肥 230026
3. 中国科学技术大学管理学院, 合肥 230026

English Abstract

The Comparative Analysis between Two Emission Abatements Considering Green Premium

1. School of Sociology and Political Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2. School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
3. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0310

The Comparative Analysis between Two Emission Abatements Considering Green Premium

计量

出版历程

考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0310

1. 安徽大学 社会与政治学院, 合肥 2306012. 中国科学技术大学 公共事务学院, 合肥 2300263. 中国科学技术大学 管理学院, 合肥 230026

English Abstract

The Comparative Analysis between Two Emission Abatements Considering Green Premium

1. School of Sociology and Political Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China2. School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China3. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 安徽大学社会与政治学院, 合肥 230601
2. 中国科学技术大学公共事务学院, 合肥 230026
3. 中国科学技术大学管理学院, 合肥 230026

1. School of Sociology and Political Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2. School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
3. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China