The Vision,Metaphor and Framework of Community Governance Cognition
-
摘要:当前对社区治理的研究多聚焦于制度、技术等层面，而较少关注人的精神世界对社区治理的影响。从这个意义上来讲，在以社区心态为引，回到社区"人"的本身来思考社区治理问题时，社区治理认知就成为社区治理何以有效的条件和基础。因而，将社区视为一个相对独立的社会系统，以视界、隐喻和框架作为社区治理认知的研究对象。其中，治理层和边界构成视界结构，并在这一结构中以情境、对话勾勒视界的轮廓，以再构和融合阐述视界的意图。当面向日常生活时，社区会演化为一个隐喻的世界，而隐喻则成为治理认知的重要形式，其在认知功能上的表现在于其是组织各种概念的基础及生成生活经验的工具，而隐喻源的存在成为治理认知形成的介质。另外，从社会生活经验转化为主观认知时所依据的心理原则的框架出发，关系本身对框架的安排和优化、情感的形式及运作、想象的类型和内容成为其核心要素。由此，以视界、隐喻和框架来构建社区治理认知，且以此窥视社区治理认知对于社区治理的价值和意义。Abstract:At present,the research on community governance focuses on the system and technology,but pays less attention to the impact of the spiritual world on community governance. In this sense,when we take the community mentality as a guide and return to the community "people" to think about community governance issues,community governance cognition becomes an effective condition and foundation for community governance.Therefore,this paper regards the community as a relatively independent social system,with vision,metaphor and framework as the research object of community governance cognition. The governance layer and the boundary constitute the horizon structure,and in this structure,the outline of the horizon is outlined by the context and the dialogue,and the intention of the horizon is reconstructed and merged. Thus,the structure,contours,and intentions form a cognitive horizon to observe and understand community governance itself. When it comes to daily life,the community will evolve into a metaphorical world,and metaphor becomes an important form of governance cognition. Its cognitive function is that it is the basis for organizing various concepts and the tools for generating life experience. The metaphorical rules and meanings derived from this function indicate that the metaphor is involved in the defining factors of community governance cognition and the value of cognition of community governance,and the existence of metaphor sources becomes the medium for the formation of governance cognition. In addition,starting from the framework of the psychological principles on which social life experience is transformed into subjective cognition,The relationship itself is arranged and optimized for the framework,the form and operation of emotions,and the type and content of imagination are the core element of the framework. Therefore,we construct community governance cognition with vision,metaphor and framework,and from this we can peep into the value and significance of community governance cognition for community governance.
-
Key words:
- community governance cognition/
- horizon/
- metaphor
-
[1] 费孝通. 试谈扩展社会学的传统界限[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(3):5-16. [2] 熊易寒. 社区选举:在政治冷漠与高投票率之间[J]. 社会,2008(3):180-204. [3] TANNEN D. Framing in discourse[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1993. [4] 伍麟. 风险的生活叙事与自我认同[J]. 哲学动态,2016(9):92-98. [5] 张祥云,罗绍武. 对话的意蕴[J]. 高等教育研究,2011(7):32-39. [6] HEIDEGGER M. Poetry,language,thought[M]. New York:Happer & Row,1971. [7] LEMERT C. Social theory[M]. Boulder:Westview,1993. [8] ANDERSON M. Embodied cognition:a field guide[J]. Artificial Intelligence,2003(149):91-130. [9] JOHNSON,LAKEOFF G. Metaphor we live by[M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1980. [10] 雷可夫,约翰逊. 我们赖以生存的譬喻[M]. 周世箴,译. 台北:联经出版事业股份有限公司,2006. [11] 谢之君. 隐喻认知功能探索[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社,2007. [12] JOHNSON M. The body in the mind:the bodily basis of meaning,imagination,and reason[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987. [13] 尼尔·波兹曼. 娱乐至死[M]. 章艳,译.南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2004. [14] GOFfMAN E. Framing analysis:an essay on the organization of experience[M]. New York:Harper & Row,1974:21. [15] PAN Z,KOSICKI G M. Framing analysis:an approach to news discourse[J]. Political Communication Research,1993(10):55-75. [16] GITLIN T. The whole world is watching:mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press,1980. [17] SCHEVE C. The social calibration of emotion expression:an affective basis of micro-social order[J]. Sociological Theory,2012(1):1-15. [18] BERICAT E. The sociology of emotions:four decades of progress[J]. Current Sociology,2016(3):491-513. [19] 章士嵘. 科学发现的逻辑[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1986. [20] MACINTYRE A. Whose justice?which rationality?[M]. Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press,1988. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:823
- HTML全文浏览量:1
- PDF下载量:263
- 被引次数:0
下载:
