Evaluation of the Moral Content of Environmental Policy: Logic and Framework
-
摘要:环境政策道德含量是指环境政策中所包含的道德量。由于环境政策具有相对独立性，社会道德具有相对静止性，因而环境政策道德含量能够被评估。环境政策道德含量评估的核心要素是政策和道德，二者共同决定了环境政策道德含量评估指标生成的逻辑，即政策过程、道德形态分别决定了环境政策道德含量评估一级指标和二级指标各自的生成逻辑。环境政策道德含量评估的一级指标由政策自身的道德基础、政策关系的道德原则、政策执行的道德后果共同构成，环境政策道德含量评估的二级指标由政治道德、经济道德、社会道德、生态道德共同构成。环境政策道德含量评估的二级指标决定环境政策道德含量评估的实测指标，即由政治道德、经济道德、社会道德、生态道德生成相应的实测指标。环境政策评估的框架主要包括环境政策评估的模型、主体和操作。评估模型即为对应实测指标的特定环境政策的道德因子得分测算方法。评估主体即由环境政策制定者、环境政策受用者、专业机构组成。评估操作分为四个步骤，分别是提取道德因子、汇总道德因子实际得分、测算环境政策的道德含量、评估环境政策的质量。Abstract:The moral content of environmental policy refers to the moral quantity contained in environmental policy. Because environmental policy is relatively independent and social morality is relatively static,so the content of environmental policy morality can be evaluated. The core elements of environmental policy moral content assessment are policy and ethics,which together determine the logic of the generation of environmental policy ethical content evaluation indicators. Then the policy process and the moral form determine the generating logic of the primary index and the generating logic of the secondary index respectively. The primary index of the moral content of environmental policy consists of the moral foundation of the policy itself,the moral principles of the policy relations,and the moral consequences of the policy implementation. The secondary index of environmental policy moral content assessment is composed of political morality,economic morality,social morality and ecological morality. The secondary index of environmental policy moral content evaluation determines the measured index of environmental policy moral content evaluation,that is,the measured index produced by political morality,economic morality,social morality,and ecological morality.The framework of environmental policy assessment mainly includes the model,main body and operation of environmental policy evaluation. The assessment model is the ratio of the actual moral score of the specific environmental policy to the total social morality. The assessment body consists of environmental policy makers,recipients of environmental policies and professional structures. The evaluation operation is divided into four steps:extracting the moral elements,collecting the actual scores of the moral elements,measuring the moral content of environmental policies,and evaluating the quality of environmental policies.
-
[1] 葛晨虹. 我们怎样进行道德评价[J]. 齐鲁学刊,2001(3):27-33. [2] 丁煌. 西方行政学说史[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:419. [3] 王正平,李耀锋. 论社会公共政策的道德价值[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(3):5-13. [4] 高觉敷,叶浩生. 西方教育心理学发展史[M]. 福州:福建教育出版社,2005:420. [5] 王健敏. "生态-激励"品德测评系统的构建[J]. 教育评论,2001(3):30-32. [6] PARK N,PETERSON C,SELIGMAN M E P. Strengths of character and well-Beijing[J]. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2004,23(5):603-619. [7] KOHLBERG L. The development of moral character and ideology[C]//HOFFMAN M L,HOFFMAN L W. Review of Child Developmenta Research Vol 1. New York:Russell Sage,1964:404-405. [8] MURIEL J,JAMES R,DARCIA N. Beyond the promise:a perspective on research in moral education[J]. Educational Researcher,1999,28(4):18-26. [9] BURNELL K J,BOYCE N,HUNT N.A good war?exploring british veterans'moral evaluation of deployment[J]. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,2010,7(3):36-42. [10] ALICKE M D,MANDEL D R,HILTON D,et al. Causal conceptions in social explanation and moral evaluation:a historical tour[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science,2015,10(6):790-812. [11] ROBBINS E,SHEPARD J,ROCHAT P.Variations in judgments of intentional action and moral evaluation across eight cultures[J]. Cognition,2017,2(12):22-30. [12] 何琪. 党政领导干部思想道德素质测评内容与方法[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(5):25-28. [13] 刘玉娟,孟万金. 中学生积极道德品质测评量表的编制研究[J]. 中国特殊教育,2010(4):75-79. [14] 刘玉娟,孟万金. 小学生积极道德品质测评量表的编制研究[J]. 中国特殊教育,2011(1):70-74. [15] 刘芷含. 中国公民道德品质测评指标体系的构建与实证研究[J]. 哲学动态,2018(7):92-100. [16] 葛洪义. 法理学[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:109. [17] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第20卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1971:101. [18] 伯特兰·罗素. 伦理学和政治学中的人类社会[M]. 肖巍,译. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992:49. [19] 伍志燕. 论道德评价标准和尺度的合理性[J]. 理论与现代化,2012(3):83-87. [20] 刘时工. 论道德评价[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(4):62-67. [21] MICHAEL W. Thick and thin:moral argument at home and abroad[M]. Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press,1994:3. [22] 达尔文. 达尔文生平[M]. 叶笃庄,叶晓,译. 北京:科学出版社,2001:48. [23] 魏英敏. 新伦理学教程[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1993:114. [24] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(1卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社,1995:344. [25] 杨松. 试论政治道德的历史演进[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),1999(4):18-23. [26] 蒋云根. 略论我国政治道德建设[J]. 政治学研究,2003(2):37-40. [27] 郑秀喜. 经济道德的经济哲学思考[J]. 山东社会科学,2017(4):129-132. [28] 陈彩虹. 经济道德与经济制度[J]. 学习与探索,1998(5):23-30. [29] 朱有志. 经济道德层次论[J]. 道德与文明,2002(4):70-71. [30] 刘善球. 关于公民法律素质教育和社会道德风尚的思考[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1998(6):113-115. [31] 盛秀英,刘金华. 可持续发展与生态道德[J]. 理论探讨,2000(6):37-39. [32] 王永明. 生态道德:建设生态文明的伦理之维[J]. 社会科学辑刊,2009(5):35-37. [33] 袁祖社,董辉. 从"规范与教化"到"过程与实在"——生态道德信仰何以可能[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(6):84-93. [34] 李金. 生态道德论[J]. 前沿,2010(5):156-159. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:915
- HTML全文浏览量:1
- PDF下载量:1194
- 被引次数:0
下载:
