中国石化行业能耗为何持续增加?——回弹效应及要素替代视角

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0096

1.
哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150001
2.
哈尔滨工程大学理学院, 哈尔滨 150001

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年项目资助"我国制造业技术进步、结构调整与能源碳排放的回弹效应研究"（71303066）;黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目"技术进步对黑龙江省制造业能源碳排放的影响机制研究"（G201221）

Why Energy Consumption has been Increasing in Petrochemical Industry in China-From the Respective of Rebound Effect and Elasticity of Substitutability

1.
School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2.
School of Science, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

摘要:石化行业作为国民经济支柱产业，能源效率虽有所提高但能源消耗却一直居高不下。为探究其原因，使用Translog成本函数构建要素成本份额方程，测算能源非对称价格响应的回弹效应，并结合能源与资本的绝对替代弹性和相对替代弹性，分析1980-2013年石化行业中回弹效应变化趋势及要素替代关系变化规律，揭示中国石化行业能源消费持续增加的原因。结果表明：（1）1980-2013年，能源回弹效应为32.23%，抵消了部分由技术进步带来的能源消耗量降低；（2）资本对能源的绝对替代性强，而能源对资本的相对替代性强，表明决策者对资本价格变动的敏感性更高，更加倾向于用能源替代资本；（3）分阶段看，在能源短缺和基础设施大规模建设的"六五"和"七五"期间，回弹效应达到40%以上，资本对能源的相对替代弹性占优，"八五"至今回弹效应逐渐下降，能源对资本的相对替代弹性占优。回弹效应以及能源对资本的替代效应是石化行业能耗持续增加的主要原因。
- Translog成本函数/
- 替代弹性/
- 能源回弹效应/
- 石化行业
Abstract:China's petrochemical industry is one of pillar industries of national economy. The energy consumption in this industry remains high level although its energy efficiency has increased. To explore the reason,the paper used the translog cost function to construct the factor cost share equation,measured the rebound effect of asymmetric energy price response,and combined the absolute substitution elasticity and the relative substitution elasticity to analyze the rebound effect and trend of the changing character of the factor substitution relationship as well from 1980 to 2013. The paper also revealed the reasons for the continuous increase of energy consumption in China's petrochemical industry. The results show that:(1)The energy rebound effect was 32.23% from 1980 to 2013,offsetting the decrease of energy consumption caused by technical progress;(2)The absolute substitution of capital for energywas dominant that of energy for capital,while the relative substitution of energy for capital was dominant that of capital for energy.(3)During the period of 6thand 7th "Five-YearPlan",the reasons of shortage of energy supply and the large-scale construction of infrastructure made the rebound effect reached to more than 40%. The relative substitution elasticity of capital for energy was dominant during the period. The relative substitution elasticity of capital for energy was dominant,while the magnitude of rebound effect has been decreasing since 8th "Five-YearPlan". It could be concluded that the rebound effect and the substitution effect of energy to capital are the main reasons for the continuous increase of energy consumption in China's petrochemical industry.
- translog cost function/
- elasticity of substitution/
- energy rebound/
- petrochemical industry

[1]	骆瑞玲,范体军,李淑霞,等. 我国石化行业碳排放权分配研究[J]. 中国软科学,2014(2):171-178.
[2]	SAUNDERS H D. The Khazzoom-brookes postulate and neoclassical growth[J]. The Energy Journal,1992,13:131-145.
[3]	KHAZZOOM D J. Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances[J]. The Energy Journal,1980,1:21-39.
[4]	SAUNDERS H D. Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services?[J]. Energy Policy,2000,28(6-7):497-500.
[5]	DAVID C B,LESTER H,SORRELL S. Review of evidence for the rebound effect-technical report 3:elasticity of substitution studies[R]. Sussex:UK Energy Research Center,2007,7(5):39-56.
[6]	KHAZZOOM D J. Energy saving resulting from the adoption of more efficient appliances[J]. The Energy Journal,1987,8(4):85-91.
[7]	JAN B. Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption[J].Energy Economics,2004,26(1):123-134.
[8]	WASHIDA T. Economy-wide model of rebound effect for environmental efficiency[C]. International Workshop on Sustainable Consumption,University of Leeds,2004(6A):633-643.
[9]	BOONEKAMP P G M. Price elasticities,policy measures and actual developments in household energy consumption-a bottom up analysis for the Netherlands[J]. Energy Economics,2007(2):133-157.
[10]	BROBERG T,BERG C,SAMAKOVLIS E. The economy-wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries-a general equilibrium analysis[J]. Energy Policy,2015(8):26-37.
[11]	周勇,林源源. 技术进步对能源消费回报效应的估算[J]. 经济学家,2007(2):45-52.
[12]	刘源远,刘凤朝. 基于技术进步的中国能源消费反弹效应——使用省际面板数据的实证检验[J]. 资源科学,2008(9):1300-1306.
[13]	国涓,凌煜,郭崇慧. 中国工业部门能源消费反弹效应的估算——基于技术进步视角的实证研究[J]. 资源科学,2010(10):1839-1845.
[14]	国涓,郭崇慧,凌煜.中国工业部门能源反弹效应研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2010(11):114-126.
[15]	LIN B,LI J. The rebound effect for heavy industry:empirical evidence from China[J]. Energy Policy,2014(3):589-599.
[16]	LIN B,TIAN P. The energy rebound effect in China's light industry:a translog cost function approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016(4):2793-2801.
[17]	LIN B,ZHAO H. Technological progress and energy rebound effect in China's textile industry:evidence and policy implications[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2016,60:173-181.
[18]	LIN B,XIE X. Factor substitution and rebound effect in China's food industry[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2015,105:20-29.
[19]	陈晓玲,徐舒,连玉君. 要素替代弹性、有偏技术进步对我国工业能源强度的影响[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2015(3):58-76.
[20]	PINDYCK R. Interfuel substitution and the industrial demand for energy:an international comparison[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1979,61(2):169-179.
[21]	WELSCH H,OCHSEN C. The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany:factor substitution,technological changeand trade[J]. Energy Economics,2005,27(1):93-111.
[22]	BERNT E R,WOOD D O. Engineering econometric interpretation of energy-capital complementary[J]. The American Economic Review,1979(3):342-354.
[23]	POPP D C. The effect of new technology on energy consumption[J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2001(3):215-239.
[24]	陶小马,邢建武,黄鑫,等. 中国工业部门的能源价格扭曲与要素替代研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2009(11):3-16.
[25]	鲁成军,周端明. 中国工业部门的能源替代研究——基于对ALLEN替代弹性模型的修正[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2008(5):30-42.
[26]	张纪凤,黄萍. 中国制造业能源与非能源要素替代关系的实证研究[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2011(4):37-44.
[27]	董会忠,闫秀霞,陶建格. 中国钢铁工业能源-资本-劳动替代关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2012(8):120-127.
[28]	郝枫. 超越对数函数要素替代弹性公式修正与估计方法比较[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2015(4):88-105+122.
[29]	孙巍,赫永达. 能源异质性及其与资本替代的非对称效应研究[J]. 经济问题,2015(2):9-18.
[30]	BERNDT E R,CHRISTENSEN L R. The translog function and the substitution of equipment,structures,and labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929-68[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1973(1):81-113.
[31]	FRONDEL M. Modelling energy and non-energy substitution:a brief survey of elasticities[J]. Energy Policy,2011,39(8):4601-4604.
[32]	BLACKORBY C,RUSSELL R R. Will the real elasticity of substitution please stand up[J]. American Economic Review,1989,79(4):882-888.
[33]	GATELY D. HYBTUBGTON H G. The asymmetric effects of change in price and income on energy and oil demand[J]. Energy,2002,23(1):19-25.
[34]	陈诗一. 中国工业分行业统计数据估算:1980-2008[J]. 经济学(季刊),2011(3):735-776.
[35]	张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏. 中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J]. 经济研究,2004(10):35-44.
[36]	张华,魏晓平,吕涛. 能源节约型技术进步、边际效用弹性与中国能源消耗[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2015(2):11-22.
[37]	STOCK J H,WATSON M W. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems[J]. Econometrica,1993,61(4):783-820.
[38]	魏梅,曹明福,江金荣. 生产中碳排放效率长期决定及其收敛性分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2010(9):43-52.
[39]	KIM J,HEO E. Asymmetric substitutability between energy and capital:evidence from the manufacturing sectors in 10 OECD countries[J]. Energy Economics,2013(2):81-89.
[40]	CHAKRAVARTY D,DASGUPTA S,ROY J. Rebound effect:how much to worry?[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013(2):216-228.
[41]	ROY J. The rebound effect:some empirical evidence from India[J]. Energy Policy,2000(6-7):433-438.
[42]	姜晔,田涛. 碳排放约束下石油石化产业全要素能源效率研究[J]. 当代石油石化,2011(11):21-28+50.
[43]	朱彤. 我国石化工业能源效率与节能潜力[J]. 经济管理,2010(10):27-35.

[1]	唐葆君, 陈俊宇, 王崇州.政策工具视角下能源行业发展差异分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(2): 21-27.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0247
[2]	卓玛草.中国要素配置与人力资本错配效应的分行业测算分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(4): 113-123.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.2260
[3]	史文强, 孔昭君, 邓晓童.国民经济动员链弹性基本理论初探. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(5): 96-106.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.1936
[4]	史文强, 孔昭君.国民经济动员链弹性基本理论初探. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, (): -.
[5]	杨洁, 张茗, 刘运材.碳信息披露如何影响债务融资成本——基于债务违约风险的中介效应研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 28-38.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.2236
[6]	陈亚, 张志强, 周志翔, 梁樑.中国制造业全要素能源效率分析——基于地区和细分行业双重视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 48-58.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1895
[7]	唐葆君, 王翔宇, 王彬, 吴郧, 邹颖, 许黄琛, 马也.中国新能源汽车行业发展水平分析及展望. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (2): 6-11.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.7261
[8]	吕鑫, 吕一明, 胡长虹, 余畅, 赵鲁涛.2018年石化产业前景预测与展望. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (2): 15-18,23.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.5174
[9]	史文强, 刘浪, 汪明月, 李文川.价格随机和销售成本信息不对称下的应急数量弹性契约. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (4): 120-127.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3423
[10]	董维佳, 吕鑫, 胡长虹, 谭朝升, 余畅, 赵鲁涛.2016年石化产业前景预测与展望. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (2): 18-21.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0204
[11]	梁晓捷, 王兵, 张皓, 唐葆君.钢铁行业能源效率与碳排放. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (2): 34-38.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0207
[12]	王韶华.中国工业行业碳强度的因素分析——基于超越对数生产函数. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (3): 22-29.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0303
[13]	张华, 魏晓平.能源替代与内生经济增长路径研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (4): 42-49.
[14]	魏玮, 何旭波.中国工业部门的能源CES生产函数估计. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (1): 27-31.
[15]	徐辉, 李健.中国银行业成本效率实证研究(1999-2010)——基于SFA测度方法的应用. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (3): 74-83.
[16]	王琛, 王兆华, 卢密林.能源直接回弹效应经济学分析:微观视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (2): 28-33.
[17]	李兰兰, 诸克军, 杨娟.天然气需求价格弹性研究综述. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (6): 22-31.
[18]	王艳丽, 李强.对外开放度与中国工业能源要素利用效率——基于工业行业面板数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2012, (2): 27-33.
[19]	李先柏.C-D生产函数、成本、要素用量及参数估计. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 70-76.
[20]	夏恩君.论企业技术创新的自我替代. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2000, (3): 67-70.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:1054
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:690
被引次数:0

留言板

中国石化行业能耗为何持续增加?——回弹效应及要素替代视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0096

Why Energy Consumption has been Increasing in Petrochemical Industry in China-From the Respective of Rebound Effect and Elasticity of Substitutability

计量

中国石化行业能耗为何持续增加?——回弹效应及要素替代视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0096

1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150001
2. 哈尔滨工程大学理学院, 哈尔滨 150001

English Abstract

Why Energy Consumption has been Increasing in Petrochemical Industry in China-From the Respective of Rebound Effect and Elasticity of Substitutability

1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2. School of Science, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

中国石化行业能耗为何持续增加?——回弹效应及要素替代视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0096

Why Energy Consumption has been Increasing in Petrochemical Industry in China-From the Respective of Rebound Effect and Elasticity of Substitutability

计量

出版历程

中国石化行业能耗为何持续增加?——回弹效应及要素替代视角

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0096

1. 哈尔滨工程大学 经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 1500012. 哈尔滨工程大学 理学院, 哈尔滨 150001

English Abstract

Why Energy Consumption has been Increasing in Petrochemical Industry in China-From the Respective of Rebound Effect and Elasticity of Substitutability

1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China2. School of Science, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 哈尔滨 150001
2. 哈尔滨工程大学理学院, 哈尔滨 150001

1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2. School of Science, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China