制度同构下企业环境战略的异质性响应——来自重污染行业上市公司社会责任报告的经验分析

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1985

1.
对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目资助（71874029，71172106，71473038）;对外经济贸易大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目（201824）

详细信息

中图分类号:F120.4

Heterogeneous Response of Corporate Environmental Strategy under Institutional Isomorphism

1.
Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

摘要:综合运用制度理论和企业生命周期理论，剖析不同规制压力对企业环境战略的影响，以及处于生命周期不同阶段的企业对规制压力的异质性战略响应，进而从中国典型重污染行业中筛选597家上市公司，采用多项Logit模型进行实证研究。研究结果显示：（1）政策压力增加，企业倾向于选择环保领导型战略，而不倾向于选择反应型战略；（2）监管和公众压力越大，企业越不会选择反应型战略，但对选择污染防御型或环保领导型战略无明显差异；（3）进一步地，政策、监管和公众压力越大，成熟期企业越倾向于选择环保领导型战略；（4）政府政策的不断施压使初创成长期和衰退期企业偏好污染防御型战略。通过揭示规制压力、企业生命周期与企业环境战略选择的内在关系，丰富了制度同构和战略异质性二元行动逻辑的理论分析。
- 环境战略/
- 规制压力/
- 企业生命周期
Abstract:Based on legitimacy theory and the enterprise life cycle theory,we the influences of different on corporate environmental strategy are analyzed,as well as the relationship between regulatory pressure and environmental strategy in the different stages of enterprise life cycle. Then,we choose 597 listed companies from typical heavy pollution industry in China,using multiple Logit models for empirical research. The results show that:(1)Policy pressures increase,companies tend to choose environmental leadership strategy,and do not tend to choose reactive strategy;(2)The greater the supervision and public pressure are,the less likely the companies will choose reactive strategy,but there is no significant difference in the selection of pollution prevention or environmental leadership strategy;(3)Further,the greater the pressure of policies,supervision,and the public,the more favorable the enterprises in the mature period to choose the environmental leadership strategy;(4)The greater the pressure of policies,the more likely the enterprises in the growth and recession period prefer to pollution prevention strategy.
- environmental strategy/
- regulatory pressure/
- corporate life cycle

[1]	SHARMA S. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(4):681-697.
[2]	罗党论,赖再洪. 重污染企业投资与地方官员晋升——基于地级市1999-2010年数据的经验证据[J]. 会计研究,2016(4):42-48.
[3]	MURILLO-LUNA J L,GARCÉS-AYERBE C,RIVERA-TORRES P. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? a stakeholders'pressure approach[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(11):1225-1240.
[4]	PINZONE M,LETTIERI E,MASELLA C. Proactive environmental strategies in health care organizations:drivers and barriers in italy[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2014,131(1):1-15.
[5]	胡珺,王红建,宋献中. 企业慈善捐赠具有战略效应吗?——基于产品市场竞争的视角[J]. 审计与经济研究,2017,32(4):83-92.
[6]	CLEMENS B. Does coercion drive firms to adopt"voluntary" green initiatives? relationships among coercion,superior firm resources,and voluntary green initiatives[J]. Journal of Business Research,2006,59(4):483-491
[7]	WINTER S C,MAY P J. Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management,2010,20(4):675-698.
[8]	REID E M,TOFFEL M W. Responding to public and private politics:corporate disclosure of climate change strategies[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(11):1157-1178.
[9]	BEY N,HAUSCHILD M Z,MCALOONE T C. Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology,2013,62(1):43-46.
[10]	薛求知,伊晟. 环境战略、经营战略与企业绩效——基于战略匹配视角的分析[J]. 经济与管理研究,2014(10):99-108.
[11]	BUYSSE K,VERBEKE A. Proactive environmental strategies:a stakeholder management perspective[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(5):453-470.
[12]	MEYER J W,ROWAN B. Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(2):340-363.
[13]	DHALLA R,OLIVER C. Industry identity in an oligopolistic market and firms' responses to institutional pressures[J]. Organization Studies,2013,34(12):1803-1834.
[14]	WEBER L,MAYER K. Transaction cost economics and the cognitive perspective:investigating the sources and governance of interpretive uncertainty[J]. Academy of Management Review,2014,39(3):344-363.
[15]	HREBINIAK L G,JOYCE W F. Organizational adaption:strategic choice and environmental determinism[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1985,30(3) 336-349.
[16]	马中东,陈莹. 环境规制、企业环境战略与企业竞争力分析[J]. 科技管理研究,2010,30(7):99-101.
[17]	HAYES J,ALLINSON C W. Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations[J]. Human Relations,1998,51(7):847-871.
[18]	PENROSE E. The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.
[19]	GREINER L E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow[J]. Harvard Business Review,1972(50):37-46.
[20]	HENRIQUES I,SADORSKY P. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(1):87-99.
[21]	HART S L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm[J]. Academy of Management Review,1995,20(4):986-1014.
[22]	DIMAGGIO P J. The iron cage revisited:institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
[23]	OLIVER C M. Strategic responses to institutional processes[J]. Academy of Management Review,1991,16(1):145-179.
[24]	金永生,李吉音,李朝辉. 网络导向、价值共创与新创企业绩效——制度环境与企业发展阶段的调节[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版),2017,19(6):70-78.
[25]	WORTHINGTON I,PATTON D. Exective summary:strategic intent in the management of the green environment within SMEs:an analysis of the UK screen-printing sector[J]. Long Range Planning,2005,38(2):197-212.
[26]	WILLIAMSON D,LYNCH-WOOD G,RAMSAY J. Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2006,67(3):317-330.
[27]	CLARKSON P M,LI Y,RICHARDSON G D,et al. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure:an empirical analysis[J]. Accounting Organizations & Society,2008,33(4-5):303-327.
[28]	LOUNSBURY M,VENTRESCA M,HIRSCH P M. Social movements,field frames and industry emergence:a cultural-politica perspective on U.S. recycling[J]. Socio-Economic Review,2003,1(1):71-104
[29]	CHEN J. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures:do family-controlled firms pollute less?[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2010,55(1):82-113.
[30]	王炳成. 企业生命周期研究述评[J]. 技术经济与管理研究,2011(4):52-55.
[31]	吴先明,张楠,赵奇伟. 工资扭曲、种群密度与企业成长:基于企业生命周期的动态分析[J]. 中国工业经济,2017(10):137-155.
[32]	VANNOORENBERGHE G. Firm-level volatility and exports[J]. Journal of International Economics,2012,86(1):57-67.
[33]	周员凡. 企业的发展阶段与社会责任[J]. 经济导刊,2010(11):44-45.
[34]	杨艳,邓乐,陈收. 企业生命周期、政治关联与并购策略[J]. 管理评论,2014,26(10):152-159.
[35]	聂辉华,江艇,杨汝岱. 中国工业企业数据库的使用现状和潜在问题[J]. 世界经济,2012(5):142-158.
[36]	LIN H Y. Cross-sector alliances for corporate social responsibility partner heterogeneity moderates environmental strategy outcomes[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012,110(2):219-229.
[37]	COHEN J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales[J]. Educational & Psychological Measurement,1960,20(1):37-46.
[38]	王书斌,徐盈之. 环境规制与雾霾脱钩效应——基于企业投资偏好的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2015(4):18-30.
[39]	黄宏斌,翟淑萍,陈静楠. 企业生命周期、融资方式与融资约束——基于投资者情绪调节效应的研究[J]. 金融研究,2016(7):96-112.
[40]	JENSEN M,ZAJAC E J. Corporate elites and corporate strategy:how demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(6):507-524.
[41]	MENGUC B,AUH S,OZANNE L.The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm's performance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2010,94(2):279-298.

[1]	张明斗, 任衍婷.环境规制对生态韧性的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(6): 16-29.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.0760
[2]	林婷.清洁生产环境规制与企业环境绩效. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 24(3): 43-55.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.2998
[3]	俞毛毛, 马妍妍.环境规制抑制了企业金融化行为么？. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(2): 30-43.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.2846
[4]	沈剑飞, 陈艺丹.企业生命周期、行业竞争水平和研发平滑. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(4): 124-134.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2021.3366
[5]	毛建辉, 管超.环境规制、政府行为与产业结构升级. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (3): 1-10.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.2328
[6]	赵天骄, 肖翔, 姜钰羡.企业社会责任与企业投资水平——基于企业生命周期的视角. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2019, (6): 107-115.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1445
[7]	任小静, 屈小娥, 张蕾蕾.环境规制对环境污染空间演变的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (1): 1-8.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.3863
[8]	赵国浩, 马明.地方政府环境规制竞争背景下地区间的企业污染排放行为. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2018, (5): 1-9.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2498
[9]	张先锋, 申屠瑶, 王俊凯.环境规制、企业异质性与企业退出. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (4): 43-49.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.2384
[10]	李强, 田双双.环境规制能够促进企业环保投资吗?——兼论市场竞争的影响. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (4): 1-8.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0401
[11]	汪克亮, 孟祥瑞, 杨宝臣.环境压力视角下中国省际生态效率的分解及收敛性. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (6): 1-11.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0601
[12]	孟艳玲, 张俊瑞.生命周期视角下上市公司资产结构与价值——来自中国上市公司A股市场的经验数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2014, (2): 76-82.
[13]	梁晓捷.中国钢铁产业技术预测研究——基于专利生命周期分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (6): 16-19,26.
[14]	刘丹鹤.环境规制工具选择及政策启示. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2010, (2): 21-26.
[15]	崔婷, 陈俣秀, 于剑.基于生命周期的民航运输产业竞争力演化研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (6): 38-41.
[16]	孙正林, 王要武, 刘红娜.规模经济院延长中小企业生命周期的理性选择. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (3): 24-27.
[17]	胡敏, 张纪海.基于生命周期的国民经济动员联盟组织模式研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2008, (6): 33-35.
[18]	崔征.企业战略联盟的伙伴选择. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (2): 74-77.
[19]	汪波, 韩玮.基于品牌生命周期的药品营销策略研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2006, (6): 41-43.
[20]	曾凤章, 王元华.基于企业生命周期的顾客满意度研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2005, (4): 36-39.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:1331
HTML全文浏览量:1
PDF下载量:183
被引次数:0

留言板

制度同构下企业环境战略的异质性响应——来自重污染行业上市公司社会责任报告的经验分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1985

Heterogeneous Response of Corporate Environmental Strategy under Institutional Isomorphism

计量

制度同构下企业环境战略的异质性响应——来自重污染行业上市公司社会责任报告的经验分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1985

1. 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029

English Abstract

Heterogeneous Response of Corporate Environmental Strategy under Institutional Isomorphism

1. Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

制度同构下企业环境战略的异质性响应——来自重污染行业上市公司社会责任报告的经验分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1985

Heterogeneous Response of Corporate Environmental Strategy under Institutional Isomorphism

计量

出版历程

制度同构下企业环境战略的异质性响应——来自重污染行业上市公司社会责任报告的经验分析

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2019.1985

1. 对外经济贸易大学 国际商学院, 北京 100029

English Abstract

Heterogeneous Response of Corporate Environmental Strategy under Institutional Isomorphism

1. Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029