The Influence of Environmental Regulation on the Spatial Evolution of Environmental Pollution
-
摘要:通过构建环境规制强度综合指数和环境污染综合指数，运用全域自相关检验、局域空间自相关检验、局域空间自相关分布及显著性检验，实证研究2004—2014年中国各省份环境污染的空间格局与空间演变；基于空间杜宾模型实证检验环境规制对环境污染空间影响的作用机理。结果显示：（1）中国各省份的环境污染存在显著空间正自相关性，在区域空间分布上形成了高低两个集聚区域，低污染物排放集聚区正在由东部向东南部扩展，高污染物排放集聚区正在由西北部向东北部扩展；（2）环境规制强度、技术创新对环境质量的改善起阻碍作用，表明中国目前的环境规制确实存在“绿色悖论”，技术创新并未激发波特假说的“创新补偿”效应。对外开放程度的提高可以显著改善环境质量，中国并不存在“污染天堂”；（3）环境规制强度和对外开放程度的直接效应远大于间接效应，产业结构和技术创新的间接效应大于其直接效应，也就是说，本地环境污染受本地环境规制和对外开放程度的影响大于受相邻地区的环境规制强度和对外开放程度的影响，本地环境污染受相邻地区的产业结构和技术创新的影响大于本地的工业化水平和技术创新的影响。Abstract:In this paper,a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental regulation intensity and environmental pollution was made. Global autocorrelation test and local space autocorrelation test were conducted and the results of autocorrelation distribution and significance test of local space were analyzed. Besides,the spatial pattern and spatial evolution of environmental pollution in provinces in China from 2004 to 2014 were studied empirically, and the effect mechanism of environmental regulation on environmental pollution was tested using Spatial Dubin Model. The results show that;(1) the environmental pollution in provinces of China shows significant spatial autocorrelation, forming one cluster of areas of heavy pollution expanding from northwest to northeast and one cluster district of low pollution expanding from east to southeast;(2)environmental regulation intensity and technological innovation hinder the improvement of environment, implying that there is a "green paradox" in China's environmental regulation and technological innovation does not stimulate the "innovation compensation" effect of the Potter hypothesis;(3)the direct effect of environmental regulation intensity is greater than its indirect effect, as well as the level of opening-up. However, the indirect effect of industrial structure and technological innovation are greater than their direct effect. In other words, local environmental pollution is more affected by local environmental regulation intensity and the level of opening-up than that in adjacent provinces. The influence of industrial structure and technological innovation in adjacent provinces is great than that affected by local level of industrialization and technological innovation.
-
[1] 付云鹏,马树才. 中国区域资源环境承载力的时空特征研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2015(9):96-103. [2] PORTER M E,CLAAS V D L. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118. [3] SHADBEGIAN R J,GRAY W B. Assessing multi-dimensional performance:environmental and economic outcomes[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2006,6(3):213-234. [4] OSBORNE D,GAMBLER T. Reinventing government[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Translation Publishing House,1996. [5] 张华,魏晓平. 绿色悖论抑或倒逼减排——环境规制对碳排放影响的双重效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(9):21-29. [6] 刘玉博,汪恒. 内生环境规制、FDI与中国城市环境质量[J]. 财经研究,2016,42(12):119-130. [7] 钟茂初,李梦洁,杜威剑. 环境规制能否倒逼产业结构调整——基于中国省际面板数据的实证检验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(8):107-115. [8] 夏勇,钟茂初. 环境规制能促进经济增长与环境污染脱钩吗?[J]. 商业经济与管理,2016(11):70-78. [9] 张志强. 环境规制提高了中国城市环境质量吗?[J]. 产业经济研究,2017(3):69-80. [10] 宋爽. 不同环境规制工具影响污染产业投资的区域差异研究[J]. 西部论坛,2017,27(2):90-99. [11] 惠炜,赵国庆. 环境规制与污染避难所效应[J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2017(2):23-33. [12] SINN H W. Public policies against global warming:a supply side approach[J]. Cesifo Working Paper,2008,15(4):360-394. [13] JORGENSON D W,WILCOXEN P J. Environmental regulation and U.S. economic growth[J]. Rand Journal of Economics,1990,21(2):314-340. [14] SANCHO F H,TADEO A P,MARTINEZ E. Efficiency and environmental regulation:an application to Spanish wooden goods and furnishings industry[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2000,15(4):365-378. [15] RASSIER D G,EARNHART D. The Effect of clean water regulation on profitability:testing the porter hypothesis[J]. Land Economics,2010,86(2):329-344. [16] JORGE M L,MADUENO J H,MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ D,et al. Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises:is there a direct link?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,101(1):26-37. [17] 周肖肖,丰超,胡莹. 环境规制与化石能源消耗——技术进步和结构变迁视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(12):35-44. [18] 余长林,高宏建. 环境管制对中国环境污染的影响——基于隐性经济的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2015(7):21-35. [19] 王旭辉. 地方政府过度规制的外部经济效应检验:1980-2011——基于珠海市工业企业政府投资规制的实证研究[J]. 暨南学报(社会科学版),2016(9):40-49. [20] 柴泽阳,孙建. 中国区域环境规制"绿色悖论"研究[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2016,33(6):33-41. [21] 甘家武,龚旻,冯坤媛. 中国环境规制对经济发展方式的影响研究[J]. 生态经济,2017,33(1):14-27. [22] 黄清煌,高明,吴玉. 环境规制工具对中国经济增长的影响[J]. bob手机在线登陆学报(社会科学版),2017,19(3):33-42. [23] 史丹,马丽梅. 京津冀协同发展的空间演进历程:基于环境规制视角[J]. 当代财经,2017(4):3-13. [24] 林伯强,蒋竺均. 中国二氧化碳的环境库兹涅茨曲线预测及影响因素分析[J]. 管理世界,2009(4):27-36. [25] 王立平,管杰,张纪东. 中国环境污染与经济增长:基于空间动态面板数据模型的实证分析[J]. 地理科学,2010(6):818-825. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:1032
- HTML全文浏览量:1
- PDF下载量:491
- 被引次数:0
下载:
