从主位推进分析看司法判决推理
On Judicial Reasoning from the Perspective of Thematic Progression
-
摘要:司法判决书是裁判过程的书面表达。法官做出裁判的过程,实质上就是以认定的案件事实和相关的法律规范为前提,运用演绎形式推理合乎逻辑地推演出判决结论的司法判决推理过程。综合Danes(1974)提出的5种主位推进模式和徐盛桓(1982)提出的4 种主位推进模式,并根据提出的连贯话语推进的9 种主位述位逻辑关系,探讨一篇优秀民事判决书的“本院认为……”部分如何实现演绎形式推理和法律命题内容实质推理双重共振的司法判决推理过程,从法律语言学视角对当前我国的裁判文书改革朝着论证体裁方向发展提供有益启示和借鉴。Abstract:Judicial judgments are the written records of legal proceedings. In nature, it is on the condition that the judge engages himself in the task of judicial reasoning in the form of deductive reasoning by finding legal material facts and applying legal norms in point that the judge makes a judicial decision. On the basis of the five patterns of thematic progression proposed by Danes (1974) and the four patterns of thematic progression advanced by Xu Shenghuan (1982), as well as the nine logical relations between theme components and rheme components threading a coherent discourse, which are put forward in the present study, a (According to the court, ...)text extracted from a well -formed civil case judgment in China is analyzed and interpreted with regard to how it accomplishes a judicial reasoning filled with legal-premise-oriented substantive reasoning in the form of deductive reasoning. The significance of the present study lies in its direct goal to shed insightful implication and enlightment on the current argumentativegenre- oriented reform of judicial judgments in China from a forensic linguistic perspective.
-
[1] 张真理.裁判文书写作的误区[J].国家检察官学院学报,2009,17(2):77-84. [2] 舒国莹.战后德国法哲学的发展路向[J]. 比较法研究,1995,9(3): 348. [3] 杨阳.裁判文书中证据说理的语段研究[J].语言文字应用,2005,14(3):111-115. [4] 董敏.论当前中国民事一审判决书的语类结构潜势[J].修辞学习,2006,25(4):33-36. [5] 张琛权.认知理论在刑事判决书说理中的应用[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2009,23(4):14-16. [6] 王培光.香港与内地判决书法律语言的比较研究[J].语言教学与研究,2006,28(2):35-42. [7] 杨海明.两岸三地刑事判决书语言程式度比较研究[J].修辞学习,2006,25(6):30-33. [8] 程乐.判后语之体裁分析[J].浙江工商大学学报,2006,20(1):77-80. [9] 张继成.从案件事实之“是”到当事人之“应当”——法律推理机制及其正当理由的逻辑研究[J].法学研究,2003,25(1):64-82. [10] 郑永流.法律判断形成的模式[J].法学研究,2004,26(1):140-149. [11] 华劭.语言经纬[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003:293. [12] Halliday M A K. An introduction to functional grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold,1994: 38. [13] Danes F.Functional sentence perspective on the organization of text[C]//F Danes(ed.).Papers on functional sentence perspective.The Hagice: Mouton,1974: 106-128. [14] 徐盛桓.主位和述位[J].外语教学与研究,1982,6(1):1-9. [15] 黄衍.试论英语主位和述位[J].外国语,1985,8(5):32-26,18. [16] 戚雨村.布拉格学派和马泰休斯的语言理论[J].外国语,1993,16(5):49-54,10. [17] 徐盛桓.再论主位和述位[J].外语教学与研究,1985,9(4):19-25. [18] 周道鸾.民事裁判文书改革与实例评析[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2003:14;330-338. [19] 石金平,张钢成.论民事判决证明模式的选择与重塑[J].法律适用,2000,15(10):10-15. [20] 张志铭.司法判决的结构和风格——对域外实践的比较研究[J].法学,1998,19(10):25-31.
计量
- 文章访问数:1010
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:387
- 被引次数:0