Dilemmas of Determinism of Common Aspiration of the People-Study on Downfall of the Qin Dynasty and Establishment of the Han Dynasty
-
摘要:在中国历史上,朝代更迭与皇位易主通常需要诉诸于暴力战争,而战争胜负却并非由民心向背所决定。长期以来,平民百姓属于被统治阶层,与皇室、官僚相比明显弱势,缺乏有效的手段抵御外来侵害,也根本无力左右政局。“民心”决定论并不能准确解释中国历史上的政局变动。儒家对民心作用的鼓吹,只是价值追求,难以得到事实证据的有力支持。在秦汉交替的历史进程中,各路诸侯相互征战,并不顾及民众的感受,他们所采取的一系列政策,都是着眼于暴力战争的胜利,并以此决定最终的成败;这也是中国古代政权更迭的一般逻辑。Abstract:In Chinese history, the change of dynasties and the rulers often resorted to the violence of war, but the outcome of the war was not decided by people's emotional attitude. For a long time, common people were the governed and the powerless compared with the imperial family and the officials. Common people lacked effective means to resist external assault, and they were unable to determine the ownership of land. Determinism of common aspiration of the people cannot explain the changes of political situations in Chinese history. The Confucian advocating of popular feelings only represented a pursuit of values, and it was difficult to be proved by strong evidence. In the historical process of the Qin and Han Dynasties, the governors fought one another regardless of the people's feelings. They adopted a series of policies for victory in the war as a way to decide who would be the ultimate victor. This was also the general logic in regime changes in ancient China.
-
[1] 祁志祥. 中国古代“民生”“民心”思想及其当代意义[J]. 浙江工商大学学报,2011(4):5-11. [2] 张秋升. 民心向背与秦亡汉兴[J]. 人民论坛,2012(9):78-80. [3] 谷梁赤. 春秋谷梁传[M]. 顾馨,徐明,校点. 沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1997:75. [4] 余英时. 士与中国文化[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,2003:15. [5] 秦晖. 田园诗与狂想曲--关中模式与前近代社会的再认识[M]. 北京:语文出版社,2010:133. [6] 孟轲. 孟子[M]. 王亚丽,注译. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003:282. [7] 司马光. 资治通鉴[M]. 张宏儒,沈志华,主编. 北京:改革出版社,1995:4019. [8] 曾国藩,胡林翼. 曾胡治兵语录[M]. 蔡锷,编. 北京:中国民族摄影艺术出版社,2002:18. [9] 商鞅. 商君书[M]. 冯国超,主编. 上海:吉林人民出版社,2005:134. [10] 李焘. 续资治通鉴长编[M]. 北京:中华书局,1985:5370. [11] 张廷玉. 明史[M]. 章培恒,喻遂生,主编. 上海:汉语大词典出版社,2004:2398. [12] 李丹. 理解农民中国--社会科学哲学的案例研究[M]. 张天虹,张洪云,张胜波,译. 南京:江苏人民出版社,2008:161. [13] 鲁子健. 清代四川财政史料(上)[M]. 成都:四川省社会科学院出版社,1984:10. [14] 孔丘. 尚书[M]. 张馨,编. 北京:中国文史出版社,2003:147. [15] 黄宗羲. 明夷待访录[M]. 北京:中华书局,1981:4. [16] 王夫之. 读通鉴论[M]. 舒士彦,点校. 北京:中华书局,1975:2482. [17] 全祖望. 鲒埼亭集[M]. 王云五. 主编. 上海:商务印书馆,1936:442. [18] 解玉峰. 元曲三百首[M]. 北京:中华书局,2009:47. [19] 韩非. 韩非子[M]. 陈秉才,译注. 北京:中华书局,2007:239. [20] 司马迁. 史记[M]. 安平秋,主编. 上海:汉语大词典出版社,2004:993,103,770,128,136-137,1209,145,1114,141. [21] 刘向. 战国策[M]. 宋韬,译注. 太原:山西古籍出版社,2003:192. [22] 贾谊. 贾谊集[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,1976:5. [23] 孔丘. 论语[M]. 鲍思陶,译注. 武汉:崇文书局,2007:161. [24] 崔瑞德,鲁惟一. 剑桥中国秦汉史[M]. 杨品泉,张书生,陈高华,等,译. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992:102,134. [25] 内藤湖南. 中国史通论(上)--内藤湖南博士中国史学著作选译[M]. 夏应元,刘文柱,徐世虹,等,译. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:149. [26] 王勇. 怀王之约与汉承秦制[J]. 史学集刊,2006(2):17-21. [27] 王子今. 刘项屠城史事辨正[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,1998(4):96-100. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:801
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:679
- 被引次数:0
下载:
