Research on Unauthorized Disposal in Bona Fide Acquisition of Real Estate
-
摘要:借名登记中出名人处分不动产的行为存在有权处分和无权处分两种不同的观点。出名人的处分应属于有权处分，第三人无论善意还是恶意，均得在合同有效的前提下取得不动产所有权，无须适用不动产善意取得制度。冒名处分他人不动产有无权处分和无权代理两种不同观点。冒名处分不动产，应属于无权代理行为，不能适用不动产善意取得。登记名义共有人处分不动产也有有权处分和无权处分两种不同观点。登记名义共有人处分不动产是无权处分行为，善意第三人可依据《物权法》第106条的规定主张善意取得。Abstract:There are two different points of view about the right of the name lender in legal relation of borrowing name to register. The positive view is that the name lender has the right to dispose of the immovable property, and the negative one is that the name lender does not have the right. The author holds the positive view, and based on which, the third party, who has made a valid contract with the name lender, has the right to acquire immovable property right, without considering whether the third party has good faith or not. The second controversial topic is about the nature of the act of disposition under somebody else's name. Some hold that it is a behavior of unauthorized disposal, and others take it as a behavior of an unauthorized agency. Standing behind the latter view, the author thinks that the act of disposition under somebody else's name should not apply to the system of Bona Fide Acquisition of immovable property. Finally, when common immovable property is registered under only one party's name, does this party have the right to dispose of the common property or not? The author holds that the party does not have the right to dispose of it without consent of other co-owners, and a Bona Fide third party has the right to claim it according to Article 106 of Property Law.
-
[1] 王利明. 不动产善意取得的构成要件研究[J]. 政治与法律,2008(10):2-10. [2] 程啸. 不动产登记簿的权利事项错误与不动产善意取得[J]. 法学家,2017(2):44-55. [3] 程啸. 不动产登记法研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2011:215. [4] 王泽鉴. 民法总则在实务上的最新发展(下)——中国台湾地区"最高法院"2001及2002年度若干判决的评释[J]. 台湾法学杂志,2003(52):76-77. [5] 杨代雄. 借名购房及借名登记中的物权变动[J]. 法学,2016(8):26-37. [6] 吴从周,卓心雅. 借名登记与无权处分[C]//吴从周. 民事法学与法学方法(第4册),台北:自出版,2010:191-194.(台湾作者可以自行出书,这本书没有出版机构) [7] 赵秀梅. 借名登记合同中的法律问题[J]. 国家检察官学院学报,2014,22(5):118-126. [8] 迪特尔·梅迪库斯. 德国民法总论[M]. 邵建东,译. 北京:法律出版社,2000:693 [9] 杨代雄. 使用他人名义实施法律行为的效果[J]. 中国法学,2010(4):88-89. [10] 朱庆育. 民法总论[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2016:337. [11] 戴永盛. 论不动产冒名处分的法律适用[J]. 法学,2014(7):123-124. [12] 王利明. 善意取得制度若干问题研究——从一起冒名顶替行为说起[C]//王利明. 判解研究. 北京:人民法院出版社,2009(2):88-89. [13] 冉克平. 论冒名处分不动产的私法效果[J]. 中国法学,2015(1):169-186. [14] 王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:565. [15] 谢在全. 民法物权论(上册)[M]. 台北:台湾地区新学林出版股份公司,2014:365. [16] 韩世远. 合同法总论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2004:253. [17] 刘贵祥. 论无权处分和善意取得的冲突和协调——以私卖夫妻共有房屋时买受人的保护为中心[J]. 法学家,2011(5):99-113. [18] 黄泷一. 无权处分——理论实务总结与民法总则制订[J]. 东方法学,2016(6):24-41. [19] 梁慧星. 如何理解《合同法》第51条[N]. 人民法院报,2000-01-08(3). [20] 吴光荣. 论无权处分的适用范围[J]. 中外法学,2005(2):328-337. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:532
- HTML全文浏览量:3
- PDF下载量:264
- 被引次数:0
下载:
