The Identity of “to Be” and “Ought to Be” in Engineering Practice—Rethink and Surpassing about a Naturalism Approach of Engineering Ethics Research
-
摘要:自然主义方法预设工程实践之“是”与“应当”的同一，这一理论思想对西方各工程社团职业伦理章程的制定、实施、评估、修订产生了重要影响。自然主义方法忽视“我”“你”“它”之间关系的生成性与复杂性，继而忽略“我”与自身、“我—你”“我—它”之间丰富而深刻的价值关联，从而导致自然主义方法在真实的工程实践情境中造成“是”与“应当”的断裂。场景叙事研究方法直面工程生活实践本身，一方面从哲学上预演了“做得好”和“活得好”在工程—人—自然—社会存在中结合的可能；另一方面，又通过“我”与“脸”的相遇表达出“我”伦理性存在的意义，同时又以时间为向度确证“好的生活”是“我”同“你”“它”一起的生活。通过构造“我”朝向工程生活的现实践履“应当”的道德意识和伦理诉求，进而认识、理解、接纳“我”“你”“它”在工程—人—自然—社会中多元复杂的价值关联，场景叙事研究方法打通了传统工程伦理研究中“方法的断裂”。Abstract:A naturalism approach, which presupposes the identity of“to be”and“ought to be” in engineering practice, has an important influence on formulating, implementing, evaluating and revising professional ethics codes of western engineering societies. However, the naturalism approach ignores the generativity and complexity of the relationship between“I”，“Thou”and “It”，thus neglecting the rich and profound value relevance among“I”，“I-Thou” and“I-It”. Thereby, the naturalism approach causes the fracture between“to be”and“ought to be” in real engineering practice contexts. The approach of contextual narrative is about engineering life practice itself. On the one hand, it philosophically previews the possibility of the combination of“how to do well” and“how to live well” in the whole existence of engineering, human, nature and society. On the other hand, the approach of contextual narrative expresses the meaning of the ethical existence of“I”through the encounter of“I”and“face”，and confirms that the“good life” should live together with“I”，“Thou” and“It” in terms of time. By constructing moral consciousness and ethical appeals that“I”should comply with my duties of“ought to be”toward realities of engineering life, and further understanding, comprehending and accepting diverse and complex value relevance among“I”，“Thou” and “It” in the whole existence of engineering, human, nature and society, the approach of contextual narrative could get through“the fracture of method” in the traditional study of engineering ethics.
-
[1] [2] 马丁.我和你[M].陈维钢,译.北京:三联书店,1986:20-27. [3] KRISTIN S. Ethics of scientific research[M]. Lanham:Rowman&Lititlefield Publishers,1994:155-156. [4] 查尔斯,普里查德,雷宾斯.工程伦理概念和案例[M].丛杭青,沈琪,译.北京:bob手机在线登陆出版社,2006. [5] 迈克,罗兰.工程伦理学[M].李世新,译.北京:首都师范大学出版社,2010:71. [6] CHARELES E. The good engineer:giving virtue its due in engineering ethics[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2008(14):153-164. [7] 亚里士多德.尼各马科伦理学[M].廖申白,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:55. [8] 卢风.自然的主体性和人的主体性[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2000,29(2):16-23. [9] 约翰.伦理学:发明对与错[M].丁三东,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2007:72. [10] 高兆明.伦理学理论与方法[M].北京:人民出版社,2005:17. [11] 徐向东.美德伦理与道德要求[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2007:59. [12] 希拉里·普特南.事实与价值二分法的崩溃[M].应奇,译.北京:东方出版社,2006:3. [13] 莫伟民,姜宇辉,王礼平.二十世纪法国哲学[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:704. [14] 埃马纽埃尔·列维纳斯.从存在到存在者[M].吴蕙仪,译.南京:江苏教育出版社,2006:117. [15] EMMANUEL L. Otherwise than being[M]. Pittsburgh:Dudesque University Press,1981:185. [16] 何菁,董群.场景叙事:工程伦理研究的新视角[J].哲学动态,2012(12):43-48. [17] [18] 凯文杰·范胡泽.保罗·利科.哲学中的圣经叙事——诠释学与神学研究[M].杨慧,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:116,122. [19] EMMANUEL L. Totality and infinity[M]. Pittsburgh:Dudesque University Press,1969:219. [20] 蒙甘.从文本到行动[M].刘自强,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1999:111. [21] PAUL R. Le conflit des interprétations[M]. Paris:Ditions Du Seuil,1969:16. [22] PAUL R. Oneself as another[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1992:330. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:1880
- HTML全文浏览量:0
- PDF下载量:1985
- 被引次数:0
下载:
