基于SBM-undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的APEC能源效率研究

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0204

1.
五邑大学经济管理学院, 广东江门 529020

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71303174);广东省社科规划基金资助项目(GD14XYJ21);广东省自然科学基金资助项目(S2012010009991);江门市科技计划项目(江科[2014]145号);江门市社科规划基金资助项目(江社规办[2014]7号); 五邑大学青年科研基金资助项目(2014zk02)

Energy Efficiency in APEC:A Meta-frontier SBM-undesirable Approach

1.
School of Economics and Management, Wuyi University, Jiangmen Guangdong 529020, China

摘要:准确测算能源效率与提升潜力可以为制定有效的节能减排策略提供科学依据。为进一步完善跨国研究中由于技术异质性导致的能源效率测算偏差,采用SBM－Undesirable 模型和Meta－frontier 生产函数,测算了APEC 17 个成员1990—2012 年期间的能源效率。同时,采用"共同技术比率"定量考察了各成员能源利用的技术差距,并从"生产技术"和"管理"两个维度将能源利用无效率分解为"技术差距无效率"和"管理无效率"来探寻能源效率提升途径。研究发现:发达国家和地区在共同前沿和群组前沿下的能源效率没有差异,发展中国家和地区在两种前沿下的能源效率有显著差异;发展中国家与潜在的最优技术水平的差距有扩大的趋势;发达国家和地区应从管理方面提高能源效率,发展中国家和地区则要从技术和管理双方面来提高能源效率。
- SBM-undesirable模型/
- 共同前沿生产函数/
- 共同技术比率/
- 技术差距无效率/
- 管理无效率
Abstract:Calculating energy efficiency and enhancing potential accurately can provide scientific basis for making effective energy-saving emission reduction strategies. In order to improve the deviation of international research of energy efficiency due to the technology heterogeneity, the SBM－Undesirable model and Meta－frontier production function were applied to calculate energy efficiency of 17 members of the APEC area during the period of 1990—2012. At the same time, technology gaps between the APEC members were measured by "meta-technology ratios". From the two dimensions of "technology" and "management", energy inefficiency was decomposed into "technology inefficiency" and "managerial inefficiency" to explore ways to improve the energy efficiency. It found that for developed countries and regions there is no difference in energy efficiency under meta-frontier and group-frontier, while there are significant differences in energy efficiency under the two frontiers for developing countries and regions; the technology gaps between developing countries and the potential optimal technology seems to increase. Developed countries and regions should improve their energy efficiency from the management aspect, and developing countries and regions should improve energy efficiency from both technology and management aspects.
- SBM-undesirable model/
- meta-frontier production function/
- meta-technology ratios/
- technology inefficiency/
- managerial inefficiency

[1]	Hu J L,Wang S. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(17):3206-3217.
[2]	Song M L,Zhang L L,Liu W,et al. Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS' energy efficiency based on small sample data[J]. Applied Energy,2013,112(12):1049-1055.
[3]	Cui Q,Li Y. The evaluation of transportation energy efficiency:an application of three-stage virtual frontier DEA[J].Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment,2014,29(2):1-11.
[4]	Benyamin K,Shahin R,Mahmoud O,et al. Reduction of CO₂emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach[J]. Energy,2013,55(6):676-682.
[5]	Chang Y T,Zhang N,Danao D,Z et al. Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China:a non-radial DEA approach[J]. Energy Policy,2013,58(7):277-283.
[6]	Wang K,Yu SW,Zhang W. China's regional energy and environmental efficiency:a DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling,2013,58(9):1117-1127.
[7]	Bi G B,Song W,Zhou P,L et al. Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model[J]. Energy Policy,2014,66(3):537-546.
[8]	Wang Q W,Zhao Z Y,Zhou P,et al. Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China:a meta-frontier DEA approach[J]. Economic Modelling,2013,35(9):283-289.
[9]	Yang L,Wang K L. Regional differences of environmental efficiency of China's energy utilization and environmental regulation cost based on provincial panel data and DEA method[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2013,58(9):1074-1083.
[10]	Hu J L,Kao C. Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies[J]. Energy Policy,2007,35(1):373－382.
[11]	Jin J L,Zhou D Q,Zhou P. Measuring environmental performance with stochastic environmental DEA:the case of APEC economies[J]. Economic Modelling,2014,38(2):80-86.
[12]	Lee K,Oh W. Analysis of CO₂emissions in APEC countries:a time-series and a cross-sectional decomposition using the log mean Divisia method[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(17):2779-2787.
[13]	Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498－509.
[14]	Cooper W W,Seiford L M,Tone K. Data envelopment analysis:a comprehensive text with models,applications,references and DEA-solver software[M]. Germany Springer LLC Press,2007:367-371.
[15]	Battese G E,Rao D S P,O'Donnell C J. A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2004(21):91-103.
[16]	O'Donnell C J. Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios[J]. Empirical Economics 2008(34):231-255.
[17]	Chiu C R,Liou J L,Wu P I,et al. Decomposition of the environment inefficiency of the metafrontier with undesirable output[J].Energy Economics,2012,34(5):1392-1399.
[18]	Tulkens H,Vanden E P. Non-parametric efficiency,progress,and regress measure for panel data:methodological aspects[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1995,80(3):472-479.

[1]	纪闻.论违背公序良俗合同无效后的返还后果. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, (): -.
[2]	纪闻.论违背公序良俗合同无效后的返还后果. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(6): 130-141.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2020.4785
[3]	王俊, 冀洋.论共同正犯“部分实行全部责任”的归属逻辑——以反思“行为共同说与犯罪共同说”为中心. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (2): 123-128,135.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0217
[4]	汪克亮, 刘蕾, 孟祥瑞, 杨宝臣.区域大气污染排放效率:变化趋势、地区差距与影响因素——基于长江经济带11省市的面板数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2017, (6): 38-48.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2017.0341
[5]	杨恺钧, 毛博伟, 胡菡.长江经济带物流业全要素能源效率——基于包含碳排放的SBM与GML指数模型. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2016, (6): 54-62.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2016.0607
[6]	刘卫先.环境保护视野下“人类共同遗产”概念反思. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (2): 121-128.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0218
[7]	董莹, 穆月英.农业技术进步、农村劳动力转移对地区工资与收入差距的影响——基于SFA-CGE两阶段模拟分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (5): 91-98.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0513
[8]	范玉仙, 袁晓玲.中国电力行业环境技术效率及影响因素研究--基于1995-2012年省级面板数据. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (4): 57-66.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0408
[9]	茹蕾, 司伟.环境规制、技术效率与水污染减排成本——基于中国制糖业的实证分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (5): 15-24.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0503
[10]	冯博, 王雪青.中国建筑业能源经济效率与能源环境效率研究——基于SBM模型和面板Tobit模型的两阶段分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (1): 14-22.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0103
[11]	汪克亮, 孟祥瑞, 杨力, 程云鹤.生产技术异质性与区域绿色全要素生产率增长——基于共同前沿与2000-2012年中国省际面板数据的分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2015, (1): 23-31.doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0104
[12]	俞立平.高技术产业研发经费投入绩效的地区差距研究——基于动态面板变系数模型的估计. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (4): 63-68.
[13]	王玲, 王赟.中国航空公司共同效率、组群效率与技术落差——基于Meta-Frontier和SBM-DEA的分析. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2013, (6): 39-45.
[14]	许健.论国际法之“人类共同利益”原则. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (5): 112-116,131.
[15]	黄建华, 党延忠.快递超网络模型及基于效率的优化方法. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (3): 68-72.
[16]	李志红, 和金生.基于Malmquist指数的人力资源管理外包供应商效率评价模型研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2011, (2): 64-69.
[17]	李公祥, 尹贻林.基于超效率DEA方法的中国建筑业生产效率实证研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2009, (4): 36-40.
[18]	霍海涛, 孙圣兰, 夏恩君.突破性技术创新过程管理研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (1): 70-72.
[19]	解百臣, 吴育华, 邓英芝.客车行业生产效率变动趋势研究. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2007, (5): 65-68.
[20]	曹观法.杜威的生产性实用主义技术哲学. bob手机在线登陆学报（社会科学版）, 2002, (2): 28-31.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:1093
HTML全文浏览量:3
PDF下载量:525
被引次数:0

留言板

基于SBM-undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的APEC能源效率研究

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0204

Energy Efficiency in APEC:A Meta-frontier SBM-undesirable Approach

计量

基于SBM-undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的APEC能源效率研究

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0204

1. 五邑大学经济管理学院, 广东江门 529020

English Abstract

Energy Efficiency in APEC:A Meta-frontier SBM-undesirable Approach

1. School of Economics and Management, Wuyi University, Jiangmen Guangdong 529020, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

留言板

基于SBM-undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的APEC能源效率研究

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0204

Energy Efficiency in APEC:A Meta-frontier SBM-undesirable Approach

计量

出版历程

基于SBM-undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的APEC能源效率研究

doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2015.0204

1. 五邑大学 经济管理学院, 广东 江门 529020

English Abstract

Energy Efficiency in APEC:A Meta-frontier SBM-undesirable Approach

1. School of Economics and Management, Wuyi University, Jiangmen Guangdong 529020, China

目录

作者相关

写作规范

友情链接

1. 五邑大学经济管理学院, 广东江门 529020